Literature DB >> 15632675

Knee biomechanics during landings: comparison of pre- and postpubescent females.

Chris J Hass1, Elizabeth A Schick, Mark D Tillman, John W Chow, Denis Brunt, James H Cauraugh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this investigation was to examine lower-extremity biomechanical differences between prepubescent and postpubescent female recreational athletes during three drop jump-landing sequences (static landing, vertical landing, and lateral landing) to determine whether maturation influenced injury risk.
METHODS: Sixteen recreationally active postpubescent women (18-25 yr of age) and 16 recreationally active girls (8-11 yr of age) participated in this study. High-speed three-dimensional videography and force plate data were recorded for each subject's performance of the landing tasks and an inverse dynamics procedure was used to estimate knee joint resultant moments and forces. Kinematic and kinetic dependent variables were analyzed in three separate mixed-design 2 x 3 (maturation level x landing sequence) repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance.
RESULTS: Statistical analyses indicated significant maturation level x landing sequence interactions for postpubescent participants who exhibited reduced knee flexion (4.5 degrees ) at initial contact, increased mediolateral knee joint forces [prepubescent: -0.63 +/- 0.21 N.(kg. radicalLH)(-1), postpubescent: 0.55 +/- 0.21 N.(kg. radicalLH)(-1)], and reduced knee extensor moments [prepubescent: -0.0124 +/- 0.001 N.m.(kg.BH. radicalLH)(-1), postpubescent: -0.0079 +/- 0.001 N.m.(kg.BH. radicalLH)(-1)] compared with their prepubescent counterparts.
CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that developmental changes influence knee mechanics during landings in female athletes and highlight the need to examine multiple landing patterns when investigating landing strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15632675     DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000150085.07169.73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  21 in total

1.  ACL Research Retreat V: an update on ACL injury risk and prevention, March 25-27, 2010, Greensboro, NC.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Ajit M Chaudhari; Darin A Padua; Scott G McLean; Susan M Sigward
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  ACL Research Retreat VII: An Update on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Risk Factor Identification, Screening, and Prevention.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anne Benjaminse; Malcolm Collins; Kevin Ford; Anthony S Kulas
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Neuromuscular and biomechanical factors.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Sex-related differences in joint-angle-specific functional hamstring-to-quadriceps strength ratios.

Authors:  Said El-Ashker; Brian P Carson; Francisco Ayala; Mark De Ste Croix
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Exploring the Justifications for Selecting a Drop Landing Task to Assess Injury Biomechanics: A Narrative Review and Analysis of Landings Performed by Female Netball Players.

Authors:  Tyler J Collings; Adam D Gorman; Max C Stuelcken; Daniel B Mellifont; Mark G L Sayers
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Intersegmental moment analysis characterizes the partial correspondence of jumping and jerking.

Authors:  Daniel J Cleather; Jon E Goodwin; Anthony M J Bull
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  ACL Research Retreat VI: an update on ACL injury risk and prevention.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anne Benjaminse; Ajit M Chaudhari; Malcolm Collins; Darin A Padua
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 8.  What is normal? Female lower limb kinematic profiles during athletic tasks used to examine anterior cruciate ligament injury risk: a systematic review.

Authors:  Aaron S Fox; Jason Bonacci; Scott G McLean; Michael Spittle; Natalie Saunders
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  Relationships Between Age at Menarche, Walking Gait Base of Support, and Stance Phase Frontal Plane Knee Biomechanics in Adolescent Girls.

Authors:  Andrew W Froehle; Kimberly A Grannis; Richard J Sherwood; Dana L Duren
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 10.  National Athletic Trainers' Association Position Statement: Prevention of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury.

Authors:  Darin A Padua; Lindsay J DiStefano; Timothy E Hewett; William E Garrett; Stephen W Marshall; Grace M Golden; Sandra J Shultz; Susan M Sigward
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.