Literature DB >> 15632456

A comparison of cost and efficacy of three incontinence skin barrier products.

Cindy L Zehrer1, James B Lutz, Edwin C Hedblom, Li Ding.   

Abstract

Maintaining healthy, intact perineal skin in nursing home residents with incontinence is a challenge. Their condition puts them at risk for developing incontinence dermatitis, possibly predisposing them to develop pressure ulcers. To examine the cost-effectiveness of three perineal skin barriers (a polymer-based barrier film and two petrolatum ointments) used to prevent incontinence dermatitis, a 6-month descriptive study was conducted among residents (N = 250) from four long-term care facilities (nursing homes) in the upper Midwestern US. All residents were incontinent and had intact perineal skin when they enrolled in the study. An economic analysis was performed using time-motion data from a convenience sample of enrolled residents and their caregivers. Residents had an average of 4.1 (+/-2.307) incontinent episodes per day, the occurrence of incontinence dermatitis was 3.3 % and not significantly different between the different protocols of care (P = 0.4448). Results of the economic analysis showed that daily barrier application costs ranged from $0.17 for the barrier film to $0.76 for the ointments evaluated. With labor included in the analysis, costs were also lower for the barrier film that required the least frequent application ($0.26) compared to ointments that required more frequent application ($1.40). Results of this study suggest that the daily or three times weekly barrier film protocols are affordable alternatives to using petrolatum ointments in the prevention of incontinence dermatitis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15632456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ostomy Wound Manage        ISSN: 0889-5899            Impact factor:   2.629


  5 in total

1.  Prevention of Incontinence-Associated Skin Damage in Nursing Homes.

Authors:  Donna Z Bliss; Olga V Gurvich; Michelle A Mathiason; Lynn E Eberly; Kay Savik; Susan Harms; Christine Mueller; Jean F Wyman; Beth Virnig
Journal:  West J Nurs Res       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 2.  Evaluation of clinical and financial outcomes of a new no-sting barrier film and barrier cream in a large UK primary care organisation.

Authors:  Jackie Stephen-Haynes; Claire Stephens
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Health economic benefits of cyanoacrylate skin protectants in the management of superficial skin lesions.

Authors:  Kevin Y Woo
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 4.  Interventions for preventing and treating incontinence-associated dermatitis in adults.

Authors:  Dimitri Beeckman; Nele Van Damme; Lisette Schoonhoven; Aurélie Van Lancker; Jan Kottner; Hilde Beele; Mikel Gray; Sue Woodward; Mandy Fader; Karen Van den Bussche; Ann Van Hecke; Dorien De Meyer; Sofie Verhaeghe
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-10

5.  Management of incontinence-associated dermatitis: A systematic review of monetary data.

Authors:  Charlotte Raepsaet; Anika Fourie; Ann Van Hecke; Sofie Verhaeghe; Dimitri Beeckman
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.