Literature DB >> 15632426

Can genetically modified Escherichia coli with neutral buoyancy induced by gas vesicles be used as an alternative method to clinorotation for microgravity studies?

Michael Benoit1, David Klaus1.   

Abstract

Space flight has been shown to affect various bacterial growth parameters. It is proposed that weightlessness allows the cells to remain evenly distributed, consequently altering the chemical makeup of their surrounding fluid, and hence indirectly affecting their physiological behaviour. In support of this argument, ground-based studies using clinostats to partially simulate the quiescent environment attained in microgravity have generally been successful in producing bacterial growth characteristics that mimic responses reported under actual space conditions. A novel approach for evaluating the effects of reduced cell sedimentation is presented here through use of Escherichia coli cultures genetically modified to be neutrally buoyant. Since clinorotation would not (or would only minimally) affect cell distribution of this already near-colloidal cell system, it was hypothesized that the effects on final population density would be eliminated relative to a static control. Gas-vesicle-producing E. coli cultures were grown under clinostat and static conditions and the culture densities at 60 h were compared. As a control, E. coli that do not produce gas vesicles, but were otherwise identical to the experimental strain, were also grown under clinostat and static conditions. As hypothesized, no significant difference was observed in cell populations at 60 h between the clinorotated and static gas-vesicle-producing E. coli cultures, while the cells that did not produce gas vesicles showed a mean increase in population density of 10.5 % (P = 0.001). These results further suggest that the lack of cumulative cell sedimentation is the dominant effect of space flight on non-stirred, in vitro E. coli cultures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15632426     DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.27062-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)        ISSN: 1350-0872            Impact factor:   2.777


  6 in total

Review 1.  Space microbiology.

Authors:  Gerda Horneck; David M Klaus; Rocco L Mancinelli
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 2.  The Impacts of Microgravity on Bacterial Metabolism.

Authors:  Gayatri Sharma; Patrick D Curtis
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-24

3.  A Molecular Genetic Basis Explaining Altered Bacterial Behavior in Space.

Authors:  Luis Zea; Nripesh Prasad; Shawn E Levy; Louis Stodieck; Angela Jones; Shristi Shrestha; David Klaus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Effects of spaceflight and simulated microgravity on microbial growth and secondary metabolism.

Authors:  Bing Huang; Dian-Geng Li; Ying Huang; Chang-Ting Liu
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2018-05-14

Review 5.  Advances in space microbiology.

Authors:  Swati Bijlani; Elisa Stephens; Nitin Kumar Singh; Kasthuri Venkateswaran; Clay C C Wang
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-04-03

6.  Effect of simulated microgravity on E. coli K12 MG1655 growth and gene expression.

Authors:  Kotakonda Arunasri; Mohammed Adil; Katari Venu Charan; Chatterjee Suvro; Seerapu Himabindu Reddy; Sisinthy Shivaji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.