| Literature DB >> 15631551 |
Klaus Oberauer1, Ralf Schulze, Oliver Wilhelm, Heinz-Martin Süss.
Abstract
On the basis of a meta-analysis of pairwise correlations between working memory tasks and cognitive ability measures, P. L. Ackerman, M. E. Beier, and M. O. Boyle (2005; see record 2004-22408-002) claimed that working memory capacity (WMC) shares less than 25% of its variance with general intelligence (g) and with reasoning ability. In this comment, the authors argue that this is an underestimation because of several methodological shortcomings and biases. A reanalysis of the data reported in Ackerman et al. using the correct statistical procedures demonstrates that g and WMC are very highly correlated. On a conceptual level, the authors point out that WMC should be regarded as an explanatory construct for intellectual abilities. Theories of working memory do not claim that WMC is isomorphic with intelligence factors but that it is a very strong predictor of reasoning ability and also predicts general fluid intelligence and g. Copyright (c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15631551 DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.61
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Bull ISSN: 0033-2909 Impact factor: 17.737