Literature DB >> 15630943

Left subcostal closed (Veress needle) approach is a safe method for creating a pneumoperitoneum.

A Rohatgi1, A L Widdison.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The left subcostal closed approach utilizing the Veress needle has been the preferred method at one surgical practice for the past 5 years. The aims of this study were to determine whether this was a safe method for creating a pneumoperitoneum and its success rate.
METHODS: The medical records for all laparoscopic procedures performed at one practice from 1996 through 2001 were reviewed.
RESULTS: A total of 352 laparoscopic cases were reviewed. The median age of the patients was 55 years (range, 14-72), with a sex ratio of 1 male to 3.5 females. The left subcostal closed approach was not attempted in 8 patients (2%) due to left subcostal surgical scars. The left subcostal approach was successful in 342 of 344 attempts (99%). In 2 patients the method failed because the Veress needle hole could not be placed in the peritoneal cavity. An omental hematoma in one patient was the only complication.
CONCLUSION: The left subcostal closed approach is a safe and effective method for creating a pneumoperitoneum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15630943     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2004.14.278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  5 in total

1.  Reoperation following minimally invasive surgery: are the "rules" different?

Authors:  James T McCormick; Clifford L Simmang
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-11

Review 2.  Injuries caused by Veress needle insertion for creation of pneumoperitoneum: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  João Luiz Moreira Coutinho Azevedo; Otavio Cansanção Azevedo; Susana Abe Miyahira; Gustavo Peixoto Soares Miguel; Otávio Monteiro Becker; Octávio Henrique Mendes Hypólito; Afonso Cesar Cabral Guedes Machado; Wellington Cardia; Gilmara Aguiar Yamaguchi; Lola Godinho; Dalmer Freire; Carlos Eduardo Saldanha Almeida; Camila Hobi Moreira; Dalmer Faria Freire
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparison of two entry methods for laparoscopic port entry: technical point of view.

Authors:  Adriana Toro; Maurizio Mannino; Giovanni Cappello; Andrea Di Stefano; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2012-06-13

4.  Comparison of two methods of laparoscopic trocar insertion (Hasson and Visiport) in terms of speed and complication in urologic surgery.

Authors:  Mehrdad Mohammadi; Behnam Shakiba; Matin Shirani
Journal:  Biomedicine (Taipei)       Date:  2018-11-26

5.  Unnoticed biloma due to liver puncture after Veress needle insertion.

Authors:  Juan José Segura-Sampedro; Jesús Cañete-Gómez; Julio Reguera-Rosal; Francisco Javier Padillo-Ruiz; César Pablo Ramírez-Plaza
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2015-07-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.