Literature DB >> 15630401

The influence of artificial scotomas on eye movements during visual search.

Frans W Cornelissen1, Klaas J Bruin, Aart C Kooijman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Fixation durations are normally adapted to the difficulty of the foveal analysis task. We examine to what extent artificial central and peripheral visual field defects interfere with this adaptation process.
METHODS: Subjects performed a visual search task while their eye movements were registered. The latter were used to drive a real-time gaze-dependent display that was used to create artificial central and peripheral visual field defects. Recorded eye movements were used to determine saccadic amplitude, number of fixations, fixation durations, return saccades, and changes in saccade direction.
RESULTS: For central defects, although fixation duration increased with the size of the absolute central scotoma, this increase was too small to keep recognition performance optimal, evident from an associated increase in the rate of return saccades. Providing a relatively small amount of visual information in the central scotoma did substantially reduce subjects' search times but not their fixation durations. Surprisingly, reducing the size of the tunnel also prolonged fixation duration for peripheral defects. This manipulation also decreased the rate of return saccades, suggesting that the fixations were prolonged beyond the duration required by the foveal task.
CONCLUSIONS: Although we find that adaptation of fixation duration to task difficulty clearly occurs in the presence of artificial scotomas, we also find that such field defects may render the adaptation suboptimal for the task at hand. Thus, visual field defects may not only hinder vision by limiting what the subject sees of the environment but also by limiting the visual system's ability to program efficient eye movements. We speculate this is because of how visual field defects bias the balance between saccade generation and fixation stabilization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15630401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  22 in total

1.  Initiation and stability of pursuit eye movements in simulated retinal prosthesis at different implant locations.

Authors:  Lin Wang; Liancheng Yang; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Stop before you saccade: Looking into an artificial peripheral scotoma.

Authors:  Christian P Janssen; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Directional processing within the perceptual span during visual target localization.

Authors:  Harold H Greene; Alexander Pollatsek; Kathleen Masserang; Yen Ju Lee; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Eye movements of patients with tunnel vision while walking.

Authors:  Fernando Vargas-Martín; Eli Peli
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  The Relationship Between Visual Function and Performance in Para Swimming.

Authors:  Daniel Fortin-Guichard; H J C Ravensbergen; Kai Krabben; Peter M Allen; David L Mann
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2022-02-04

6.  The role of peripheral vision in saccade planning: learning from people with tunnel vision.

Authors:  Gang Luo; Fernando Vargas-Martin; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Exploring eye movements in patients with glaucoma when viewing a driving scene.

Authors:  David P Crabb; Nicholas D Smith; Franziska G Rauscher; Catharine M Chisholm; John L Barbur; David F Edgar; David F Garway-Heath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impact of simulated central scotomas on visual search in natural scenes.

Authors:  Lee McIlreavy; Jozsef Fiser; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Effects of peripheral visual field loss on eye movements during visual search.

Authors:  Emily Wiecek; Louis R Pasquale; Jozsef Fiser; Steven Dakin; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-05

10.  Eye-hand coupling is not the cause of manual return movements when searching.

Authors:  Hanneke Liesker; Eli Brenner; Jeroen B J Smeets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.