Literature DB >> 1563006

Early intervention in cancer using monoclonal antibodies and other biological ligands: micropharmacology and the "binding site barrier".

J N Weinstein1, W van Osdol.   

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies and other biological ligands tend to distribute nonuniformly in bulky tumors after systemic administration. In part, that observation reflects intrinsic heterogeneity of the tumor; in part, it represents poor percolation through tumor substance. Theoretical considerations led us several years ago to formulate the "binding site barrier" hypothesis, the idea that macromolecular ligands could be prevented from penetrating tumors by the very fact of their successful binding to the target receptor. All else being equal, the higher the density of target moieties (e.g., antigens) and the higher the affinity, the greater the barrier. Experimental evidence for this hypothesis remained circumstantial until we recently obtained direct experimental verification in an animal tumor system. As shown by calculations in the present study, metabolism of ligand in free form or once it has bound to the target can also limit dramatically the extent of penetration. The PERC program package, developed to examine these issues in the case of monoclonal antibodies, has now been applied to other types of ligands as well. We speculate that the same microscopic factors have influenced the evolution of biological ligands, such as the autocrine-paracrine and chemotactic factors. Micropharmacological issues (binding sites, molecular size, and charge) should be taken into account as we design the next generation of biological ligands for systemic administration. The same issues are, perhaps, even more important with respect to molecular design of biological factors to be secreted by genetically modified cells in the treatment of cancer and in cancer vaccines. Since the PERC calculations and experiments relate to aggregates of tumor cells no more than a few hundred micron across, the ideas appear relevant to the problems of early detection and intervention. However, barriers associated with organized epithelial cell layers and basement membrane in the case of early carcinomas and carcinomatous change remain to be understood.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1563006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  32 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations for the next generation protein therapeutics.

Authors:  Dhaval K Shah
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Can nanotechnology potentiate photodynamic therapy?

Authors:  Ying-Ying Huang; Sulbha K Sharma; Tianhong Dai; Hoon Chung; Anastasia Yaroslavsky; Maria Garcia-Diaz; Julie Chang; Long Y Chiang; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Nanotechnol Rev       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.848

3.  A model for optimizing delivery of targeted radionuclide therapies into resection cavity margins for the treatment of primary brain cancers.

Authors:  Raghu Raghavan; Roger W Howell; Michael R Zalutsky
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2017-05-05

4.  Aptamer-conjugated polymeric nanoparticles for targeted cancer therapy.

Authors:  Athulya Aravind; Yasuhiko Yoshida; Toru Maekawa; D Sakthi Kumar
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.617

5.  Molecularly Targeted Cancer Combination Therapy with Near-Infrared Photoimmunotherapy and Near-Infrared Photorelease with Duocarmycin-Antibody Conjugate.

Authors:  Tadanobu Nagaya; Alexander P Gorka; Roger R Nani; Shuhei Okuyama; Fusa Ogata; Yasuhiro Maruoka; Peter L Choyke; Martin J Schnermann; Hisataka Kobayashi
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 6.261

6.  Strategies for advancing cancer nanomedicine.

Authors:  Vikash P Chauhan; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Nat Mater       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 43.841

Review 7.  Principles in the design of ligand-targeted cancer therapeutics and imaging agents.

Authors:  Madduri Srinivasarao; Chris V Galliford; Philip S Low
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 84.694

8.  The Binding Site Barrier Elicited by Tumor-Associated Fibroblasts Interferes Disposition of Nanoparticles in Stroma-Vessel Type Tumors.

Authors:  Lei Miao; Jay M Newby; C Michael Lin; Lu Zhang; Feifei Xu; William Y Kim; M Gregory Forest; Samuel K Lai; Matthew I Milowsky; Sara E Wobker; Leaf Huang
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 15.881

9.  Eradication of large solid tumors in mice with an immunotoxin directed against tumor vasculature.

Authors:  F J Burrows; P E Thorpe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Markedly enhanced permeability and retention effects induced by photo-immunotherapy of tumors.

Authors:  Kohei Sano; Takahito Nakajima; Peter L Choyke; Hisataka Kobayashi
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 15.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.