OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to investigate pain cognitions and quality of life of chronic pain patients referred to a multi-disciplinary university pain management clinic and to search for predictors of quality of life. METHODS: A heterogeneous group of 1208 chronic pain patients referred to the Maastricht university hospital pain clinic participated in this cross-sectional study. At the initial assessment, all patients completed a set of questionnaires on demographic variables, cause, location, pain intensity (McGill pain questionnaire, MPQ), pain coping and beliefs (pain coping and cognition list, PCCL), pain catastrophising (pain catastrophising scale, PCS) and eight dimensions of quality of life (Rand-36). RESULTS: The results showed that the present sample of heterogeneous pain patients reported low quality of life on each domain and significantly lower scores than has been found in previous studies with other Dutch chronic pain populations. Patients with low back pain and multiple pain localisations experienced most functional limitations. Women reported more pain, more catastrophising thoughts about pain, more disability and lower vitality and general health. When tested in a multiple regression analysis, pain catastrophising turned out to be the single most important predictor of quality of life. Especially social functioning, vitality, mental health and general health are significantly associated with pain catastrophising. CONCLUSIONS: Patients from a multi-disciplinary university pain clinic experience strikingly low quality of life, whereby low back pain patients and patients with multiple pain localisations have the lowest quality of life. Pain catastrophising showed the strongest association with quality of life, and stronger than pain intensity.
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to investigate pain cognitions and quality of life of chronic painpatients referred to a multi-disciplinary university pain management clinic and to search for predictors of quality of life. METHODS: A heterogeneous group of 1208 chronic painpatients referred to the Maastricht university hospital pain clinic participated in this cross-sectional study. At the initial assessment, all patients completed a set of questionnaires on demographic variables, cause, location, pain intensity (McGill pain questionnaire, MPQ), pain coping and beliefs (pain coping and cognition list, PCCL), pain catastrophising (pain catastrophising scale, PCS) and eight dimensions of quality of life (Rand-36). RESULTS: The results showed that the present sample of heterogeneous painpatients reported low quality of life on each domain and significantly lower scores than has been found in previous studies with other Dutch chronic pain populations. Patients with low back pain and multiple pain localisations experienced most functional limitations. Women reported more pain, more catastrophising thoughts about pain, more disability and lower vitality and general health. When tested in a multiple regression analysis, pain catastrophising turned out to be the single most important predictor of quality of life. Especially social functioning, vitality, mental health and general health are significantly associated with pain catastrophising. CONCLUSIONS:Patients from a multi-disciplinary university pain clinic experience strikingly low quality of life, whereby low back painpatients and patients with multiple pain localisations have the lowest quality of life. Pain catastrophising showed the strongest association with quality of life, and stronger than pain intensity.
Authors: Amanda E Young; Richard T Roessler; Radoslaw Wasiak; Kathryn M McPherson; Mireille N M van Poppel; J R Anema Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2005-12
Authors: Melissa H Adams; Steven K Dobscha; Ning X Smith; Bobbi Jo Yarborough; Richard A Deyo; Benjamin J Morasco Journal: J Pain Date: 2018-04-27 Impact factor: 5.820
Authors: Kashyap H Trivedi; Carey D Schlett; David R Tribble; Marshall R Monteville; John W Sanders; Mark S Riddle Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2011-06-07 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Astrid K Wahl; Tone Rustøen; Berit Rokne; Anners Lerdal; Øistein Knudsen; Christine Miaskowski; Torbjørn Moum Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2009-08-18 Impact factor: 4.147