Literature DB >> 15629751

Evaluation of behavioral measures of risk taking propensity with inner city adolescents.

Will M Aklin1, C W Lejuez, Michael J Zvolensky, Chris W Kahler, Marya Gwadz.   

Abstract

The current study examined the utility of behavioral measures of risk-taking propensity in the assessment of self-reported real-world risk-taking behaviors using a sample of 51 high-school-aged inner-city adolescents. Results indicated that performance on one behavioral measure, the balloon analogue risk task, accounted for unique variance in self-reported delinquency/safety risk behaviors as well as substance use risk behaviors, above and beyond that provided with demographics and self-report measures of risk-related constructs (i.e., impulsivity and sensation seeking). These results are discussed in relation to the potential utility of using a multimethod assessment approach for better understanding risk-taking vulnerability among adolescents.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15629751     DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2003.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  102 in total

1.  Development and preliminary validation of a behavioral task of negative reinforcement underlying risk-taking and its relation to problem alcohol use in college freshmen.

Authors:  Laura MacPherson; Nicholas T Calvin; Jessica M Richards; Leila Guller; Linda C Mayes; Michael J Crowley; Stacey B Daughters; Carl W Lejuez
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Similar Processes Despite Divergent Behavior in Two Commonly Used Measures of Risky Decision Making.

Authors:  Anthony J Bishara; Timothy J Pleskac; Daniel J Fridberg; Eldad Yechiam; Jesolyn Lucas; Jerome R Busemeyer; Peter R Finn; Julie C Stout
Journal:  J Behav Decis Mak       Date:  2009-10

3.  Assessment of risk-taking and impulsive behaviors: A comparison between three tasks.

Authors:  Sihua Xu; Marc Korczykowski; Senhua Zhu; Hengyi Rao
Journal:  Soc Behav Pers       Date:  2013

4.  Prefrontal cortex activity is reduced in gambling and nongambling substance users during decision-making.

Authors:  Jody Tanabe; Laetitia Thompson; Eric Claus; Manish Dalwani; Kent Hutchison; Marie T Banich
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Sensation seeking and risk-taking propensity as mediators in the relationship between childhood abuse and HIV-related risk behavior.

Authors:  Marina A Bornovalova; Marya A Gwadz; Christopher Kahler; W M Aklin; C W Lejuez
Journal:  Child Abuse Negl       Date:  2007-12-21

6.  Smaller feedback ERN amplitudes during the BART are associated with a greater family history density of alcohol problems in treatment-naïve alcoholics.

Authors:  George Fein; Maria Chang
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2007-09-14       Impact factor: 4.492

7.  Differential associations between impulsivity and risk-taking and brain activations underlying working memory in adolescents.

Authors:  Karni Panwar; Helena J V Rutherford; W Einar Mencl; Cheryl M Lacadie; Marc N Potenza; Linda C Mayes
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Risky decision making from childhood through adulthood: Contributions of learning and sensitivity to negative feedback.

Authors:  Kathryn L Humphreys; Eva H Telzer; Jessica Flannery; Bonnie Goff; Laurel Gabard-Durnam; Dylan G Gee; Steve S Lee; Nim Tottenham
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2015-09-21

9.  The effect of posttraumatic stress disorder on risk-taking propensity among crack/cocaine users in residential substance abuse treatment.

Authors:  Matthew T Tull; Adria Trotman; Michelle S Duplinsky; Elizabeth K Reynolds; Stacey B Daughters; Marc N Potenza; C W Lejuez
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.505

10.  Ventral striatum activation to prosocial rewards predicts longitudinal declines in adolescent risk taking.

Authors:  Eva H Telzer; Andrew J Fuligni; Matthew D Lieberman; Adriana Galván
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 6.464

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.