Literature DB >> 15629420

On the methodological weakness of 'the effective number of codons': a reply to Marashi and Najafabadi.

Anders Fuglsang1.   

Abstract

In a recent publication [Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 317 (2004) 957] it was proposed that the 'effective number of codons' (Nc) in a gene should be calculated by summing the individual amino acid Nc's using rounding whenever the codon homozygosities are lower than the reciprocal value of the number of members of the synonymous families. This led Marashi and Najafabadi to examine the consequences of individual re-adjustment when comparing observed Nc with the expected Nc under assumptions of no selection, and C=G and A=T [Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 324 (2004) 1]. Clearly, the present methodology has some weaknesses; in this work, I discuss these in relation to the observations by Marashi and Najafabadi, and finally an alternative method for the calculation of Nc is introduced with the purpose of eliminating the need for re-adjustments.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15629420     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.11.133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  2 in total

1.  Estimating the "effective number of codons": the Wright way of determining codon homozygosity leads to superior estimates.

Authors:  Anders Fuglsang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Relative codon adaptation index, a sensitive measure of codon usage bias.

Authors:  Soohyun Lee; Seyeon Weon; Sooncheol Lee; Changwon Kang
Journal:  Evol Bioinform Online       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 1.625

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.