OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to identify which asymptomatic diabetic patients are candidates for screening single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging and to examine angiographic findings and mortality in patients according to SPECT imaging categories. BACKGROUND: Previously we reported a high percentage of abnormal and high-risk SPECT imaging scans in asymptomatic diabetic patients. METHODS: We examined the associations between several clinical and laboratory variables and a high-risk stress SPECT imaging scan in 1,427 asymptomatic diabetic patients without known coronary artery disease (CAD). Results of coronary angiography and long-term outcome were also analyzed. RESULTS: An abnormal stress SPECT imaging scan was present in 826 patients (58%) and a high-risk scan in 261 patients (18%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that seven variables were independently associated with a high-risk scan (model chi-square=107, p <0.0001). The two most important variables were electrocardiogram (ECG) Q waves (adjusted chi-square=38.3, p <0.001) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (adjusted chi-square=13.9, p <0.001). Coronary angiography was performed in 127 (49%) high-risk SPECT imaging patients, 61% of whom had angiographic high-risk CAD. Annual mortality rates for patient subsets categorized by SPECT imaging scans were high-risk 5.9%, intermediate-risk 5.0%, and low-risk 3.6% (p <0.001 for differences between groups). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk findings on stress SPECT imaging were present in 18% of asymptomatic diabetic patients without known CAD. Patients with high-risk scans had a high prevalence of severe CAD and a high annual mortality rate. ECG Q waves and/or evidence of PAD identified the most suitable candidates for screening.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to identify which asymptomatic diabeticpatients are candidates for screening single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging and to examine angiographic findings and mortality in patients according to SPECT imaging categories. BACKGROUND: Previously we reported a high percentage of abnormal and high-risk SPECT imaging scans in asymptomatic diabeticpatients. METHODS: We examined the associations between several clinical and laboratory variables and a high-risk stress SPECT imaging scan in 1,427 asymptomatic diabeticpatients without known coronary artery disease (CAD). Results of coronary angiography and long-term outcome were also analyzed. RESULTS: An abnormal stress SPECT imaging scan was present in 826 patients (58%) and a high-risk scan in 261 patients (18%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that seven variables were independently associated with a high-risk scan (model chi-square=107, p <0.0001). The two most important variables were electrocardiogram (ECG) Q waves (adjusted chi-square=38.3, p <0.001) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) (adjusted chi-square=13.9, p <0.001). Coronary angiography was performed in 127 (49%) high-risk SPECT imaging patients, 61% of whom had angiographic high-risk CAD. Annual mortality rates for patient subsets categorized by SPECT imaging scans were high-risk 5.9%, intermediate-risk 5.0%, and low-risk 3.6% (p <0.001 for differences between groups). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk findings on stress SPECT imaging were present in 18% of asymptomatic diabeticpatients without known CAD. Patients with high-risk scans had a high prevalence of severe CAD and a high annual mortality rate. ECG Q waves and/or evidence of PAD identified the most suitable candidates for screening.
Authors: Robert C Hendel; Brian G Abbott; Timothy M Bateman; Ron Blankstein; Dennis A Calnon; Jeffrey A Leppo; Jamshid Maddahi; Matthew M Schumaecker; Leslee J Shaw; R Parker Ward; David G Wolinsky Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Arthur J H A Scholte; Joanne D Schuijf; Antje V Kharagjitsingh; Petra Dibbets-Schneider; Marcel P Stokkel; Ernst E van der Wall; Jeroen J Bax Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2008-11-05 Impact factor: 9.236