Literature DB >> 15628706

Does the presence of esophagitis prior to PEG placement increase the risk for aspiration pneumonia?

Matthew L Carnes1, David A Sabol, Mark DeLegge.   

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine if the endoscopic presence of esophagitis predicts aspiration pneumonia after the initiation of enteral feedings in a newly placed PEG tube. A retrospective analysis of 278 patients who received a PEG tube from November 1999 to June 2002 was performed. All PEG procedures performed by a single endoscopist were reviewed from the GI Trac database at the Medical University of South Carolina. Eleven of the procedures were aborted due to technical difficulties. Nine patients received the PEG for gastric decompression only. Seven patients died within 14 days of PEG placement from non-PEG-related complications and were excluded. The resulting 251 patients included for our analysis successfully had PEG tube placement and had at least 14 days of enteral feeding. Esophagitis was defined macroscopically by the endoscopic presence of mucosal edema, friability, or obscurity of the normal vascular pattern in the distal esophagus. Aspiration was defined as the witnessed regurgitation of or tracheal suctioning of PEG feedings. Pneumonia as a consequence of aspiration was defined by development of fever and new infiltrate on chest radiograph within 14 days of PEG placement. Two hundred fifty-one patients had PEG placement (M, 127; F, 124; average age, 62.4 year; age range, 18-95 years) performed by a single endoscopist over a 32-month period. Fourteen (5.6%) of these patients had clinically evident pulmonary aspiration, with seven of them developing pneumonia. Thirteen (93%) of these patients had normal esophageal mucosa. One of the 24 patients (4%) with esophagitis or esophageal ulceration present endoscopically had an aspiration event with subsequent pneumonia. None of the 20 patients found to have some other form of esophageal pathology had an aspiration event. The overall incidence of aspiration pneumonia after the initiation of PEG feedings was 2.7% (7/251). The odds ratio that the presence of esophagitis would predict the development of aspiration pneumonia was 1.60, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.18 to 13.89. This study argues that the presence of esophagitis alone does not increase the risk of aspiration pneumonia from PEG feedings. Other factors apart from esophagitis play an important role in the incidence of aspiration pneumonia with PEG feeding

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15628706     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-004-9573-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  19 in total

Review 1.  Complications of enteral access.

Authors:  Stephen A McClave; Wei-Kuo Chang
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Tube dysfunction following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy.

Authors:  H C Wolfsen; R A Kozarek; T J Ball; D J Patterson; V A Botoman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Risk factors for pneumonia after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  P H Patel; E Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.062

4.  The efficacy and limitations of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  W R Jarnagin; Q Y Duh; S J Mulvihill; J A Ridge; T R Schrock; L W Way
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1992-03

5.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Indications, success, complications, and mortality in 314 consecutive patients.

Authors:  D E Larson; D D Burton; K W Schroeder; E P DiMagno
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  Aspiration after percutaneous gastrostomy. Assessment by Tc-99m labeling of the enteral feed.

Authors:  M J Cole; J T Smith; C Molnar; E A Shaffer
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  Aspiration pneumonia in nursing home patients fed via gastrostomy tubes.

Authors:  R Cogen; J Weinryb
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Initial placement by single endoscopic technique and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  J P Grant
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy: a dual center safety and efficacy trial.

Authors:  M H DeLegge; P F Duckworth; L McHenry; A Foxx-Orenstein; R M Craig; D F Kirby
Journal:  JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique.

Authors:  M W Gauderer; J L Ponsky; R J Izant
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 2.545

View more
  3 in total

1.  Unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy in elderly and bedridden patients.

Authors:  Mika Yuki; Yuji Amano; Yoshinori Komazawa; Hiroyuki Fukuhara; Toshihiro Shizuku; Shun Yamamoto; Yoshikazu Kinoshita
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Efficacy of half-solid nutrient for the elderly patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Toshitsugu Shizuku; Kyoichi Adachi; Kenji Furuta; Misa Niigaki; Yuko Miyaoka; Setsushi Katoh; Kyoko Kobayashi; Mitsuru Otani; Kohsaku Kawashima; Jun Otani; Yoshikazu Kinoshita
Journal:  J Clin Biochem Nutr       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.114

3.  Efficacy of pectin solution for preventing gastro-esophageal reflux events in patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  Kyoichi Adachi; Kenji Furuta; Masahito Aimi; Kousuke Fukazawa; Shino Shimura; Shunji Ohara; Shuji Nakata; Yukiko Inoue; Kanji Ryuko; Junichi Ishine; Kyoko Katoh; Toshiaki Hirata; Shuzo Ohhata; Setsushi Katoh; Mika Moriyama; Masuko Sumikawa; Mari Sanpei; Yoshikazu Kinoshita
Journal:  J Clin Biochem Nutr       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.114

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.