Literature DB >> 15627736

Vascular access monitoring improves outcomes.

Jeffrey J Sands1.   

Abstract

Vascular access monitoring can identify patients at increased risk of future access thrombosis. When coupled with a program of elective stenosis correction, access thrombosis rates decline approximately 50-75%. This results in arteriovenous (AV) fistula thrombosis rates of 0.1-0.2/patient year (vs. 0.2-0.4 at baseline) and AV graft thrombosis rates <0.5/patient year (vs. 0.8-1.2 thromboses/patient year at baseline). Evaluating the long-term impact on access survival remains problematic. There are no large-scale randomized trials and existing studies exhibit marked differences in target populations, clinical protocols and outcome definitions. Differences in payment systems also significantly influence the efficacy of monitoring and intervention programs. Despite these challenges, the current data support the K/DOQI recommendations that all patients undergo a program of regular access monitoring preferably by access flow measurement coupled with prompt imaging and elective stenosis correction for low flow accesses. Copyright 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15627736     DOI: 10.1159/000082010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Purif        ISSN: 0253-5068            Impact factor:   2.614


  9 in total

Review 1.  Combined functional and anatomical diagnostic endpoints for assessing arteriovenous fistula dysfunction.

Authors:  Ehsan Rajabi-Jaghargh; Rupak K Banerjee
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-02-06

2.  Surveillance of hemodialysis vascular access.

Authors:  William L Whittier
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 3.  Hemodialysis access thrombosis.

Authors:  Keith Bertram Quencer; Rahmi Oklu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-12

4.  Development and validation of a risk score to prioritize patients for evaluation of access stenosis.

Authors:  Brad C Astor; Kim Hirschman; John Kennedy; Stan Frinak; Anatole Besarab
Journal:  Semin Dial       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 2.886

5.  Effect of online haemodialysis vascular access flow evaluation and pre-emptive intervention on the frequency of access thrombosis.

Authors:  Edwin Wijnen; Frank M van der Sande; Jan H M Tordoir; Jeroen P Kooman; Karel M L Leunissen
Journal:  NDT Plus       Date:  2008-08-22

6.  A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Hemodialysis Access Blood Flow Surveillance Compared to Standard of Care: The Hemodialysis Access Surveillance Evaluation (HASE) Study.

Authors:  Loay Salman; Abid Rizvi; Gabriel Contreras; Christina Manning; Paul J Feustel; Ivy Machado; Patricia L Briones; Aamir Jamal; Nicolle Bateman; Laisel Martinez; Marwan Tabbara; Roberto I Vazquez-Padron; Arif Asif
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2020-08-04

7.  Analysis of novel geometry-independent method for dialysis access pressure-flow monitoring.

Authors:  William F Weitzel; Casey L Cotant; Zhijie Wen; Rohan Biswas; Prashant Patel; Harsha Panduranga; Yogesh B Gianchandani; Jonathan M Rubin
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 2.432

8.  Multiple-site hemodynamic analysis of Doppler ultrasound with an adaptive color relation classifier for arteriovenous access occlusion evaluation.

Authors:  Jian-Xing Wu; Yi-Chun Du; Ming-Jui Wu; Chien-Ming Li; Chia-Hung Lin; Tainsong Chen
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-04-30

Review 9.  Comparison of ultrasound scan blood flow measurement versus other forms of surveillance in the thrombosis rate of hemodialysis access: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Seun Deuk Hwang; Jin Ho Lee; Seoung Woo Lee; Joong Kyung Kim; Moon-Jae Kim; Joon Ho Song
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.