Literature DB >> 15627336

Assessment of human exposure to airborne fungi in agricultural confinements: personal inhalable sampling versus stationary sampling.

Atin Adhikari1, Tiina Reponen, Shu-An Lee, Sergey A Grinshpun.   

Abstract

Accurate exposure assessment to airborne fungi in agricultural environments is essential for estimating the associated occupational health hazards of workers. The objective of this pilot study was to compare personal and stationary sampling for assessing farmers' exposure to airborne fungi in 3 different agricultural confinements located in Ohio, USA (hog farm, dairy farm, and grain farm), using Button Personal Inhalable Samplers. Personal exposures were measured with samplers worn by 3 subjects (each carrying 2 samplers) during 3 types of activities, including animal feeding in the hog farm, cleaning and animal handling in the dairy farm, and soybean unloading and handling in the grain farm. Simultaneously, the stationary measurements were performed using 5 static Button Samplers and 1 revolving Button Sampler. The study showed that the total concentration of airborne fungi ranged from 1.4 x 10(4)-1.2 x 10(5) spores m(-3) in 3 confinements. Grain unloading and handling activity generated highest concentrations of airborne fungi compared to the other 2 activities. Prevalent airborne fungi belonged to Cladosporium, Aspergillus/Penicillium, Ascospores, smut spores, Epicoccum, Alternaria, and Basidiospores. Lower coefficients of variations were observed for the fungal concentrations measured by personal samplers (7-12%) compared to the concentrations measured by stationary samplers (27-37%). No statistically significant difference was observed between the stationary and personal measurement data for the total concentrations of airborne fungi (p > 0.05). Revolving stationary and static stationary Button Samplers demonstrated similar performance characteristics for the collection of airborne fungi. This reflects the low sensitivity of the sampler's efficiency to the wind speed and direction. The results indicate that personal exposure of agricultural workers in confinements may be adequately assessed by placing several Button Samplers simultaneously operating in a static stationary mode throughout the work site.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15627336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Agric Environ Med        ISSN: 1232-1966            Impact factor:   1.447


  6 in total

1.  Airway epithelial anion secretion and barrier function following exposure to fungal aeroallergens: role of oxidative stress.

Authors:  Nathan A Zaidman; Kelly E O'Grady; Nandadevi Patil; Francesca Milavetz; Peter J Maniak; Hirohito Kita; Scott M O'Grady
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 4.249

2.  Exposure matrices of endotoxin, (1→3)-β-d-glucan, fungi, and dust mite allergens in flood-affected homes of New Orleans.

Authors:  Atin Adhikari; Jocelyn Suzanne Lewis; Tiina Reponen; Enjoli C Degrasse; L Faye Grimsley; Ginger L Chew; Yulia Iossifova; Sergey A Grinshpun
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 3.  The Use of Bioaerosol Sampling for Airborne Virus Surveillance in Swine Production Facilities: A Mini Review.

Authors:  Benjamin D Anderson; John A Lednicky; Montserrat Torremorell; Gregory C Gray
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-07-27

4.  A Novel Multi-Approach Protocol for the Characterization of Occupational Exposure to Organic Dust-Swine Production Case Study.

Authors:  Carla Viegas; Tiago Faria; Ana Monteiro; Liliana Aranha Caetano; Elisabete Carolino; Anita Quintal Gomes; Susana Viegas
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2017-12-27

Review 5.  Impacts of climate change on indirect human exposure to pathogens and chemicals from agriculture.

Authors:  Alistair B A Boxall; Anthony Hardy; Sabine Beulke; Tatiana Boucard; Laura Burgin; Peter D Falloon; Philip M Haygarth; Thomas Hutchinson; R Sari Kovats; Giovanni Leonardi; Leonard S Levy; Gordon Nichols; Simon A Parsons; Laura Potts; David Stone; Edward Topp; David B Turley; Kerry Walsh; Elizabeth M H Wellington; Richard J Williams
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Mycoflora study in a wheat flour mill of Argentina.

Authors:  E E Aringoli; D E Cambiagno; C A Chiericatti; J C Basilico; M L Z Basilico
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.476

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.