STUDY DESIGN: An in vivo study to radiographically and histologically assess a new method of induction of disc degeneration. OBJECTIVE.: To establish a reproducible rabbit model of disc degeneration by puncturing the anulus with needles of defined gauges and to compare it to the classic stab model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: New treatment approaches to disc degeneration are of great interest. Although animal models for disc degenerative disease exist, the quantitative measurement of disease progression remains difficult. A reproducible, progressive disc degeneration model, which can be induced in a reasonable time frame, is essential for development of new therapeutic interventions. METHODS: The classic anular stab model and the new needle puncture model were used in the rabbit. For the needle puncture model, 3 different gauges of needle (16G, 18G, and 21G) were used to induce an injury to the disc to a depth of 5 mm. Radiographic and histologic analyses were performed; magnetic resonance images were also assessed in the needle puncture model. RESULTS: Significant disc space narrowing was observed as early as 2 weeks after stabbing in the classic stab model; there was no further narrowing of the disc space. In the needle puncture model, all needle sizes tested induced a slower and more progressive decrease in disc height than in the classic stab model. The magnetic resonance imaging supported the results of disc height data. CONCLUSIONS: The needle puncture approach, using 16G to 21G needles, resulted in a reproducible decrease of disc height and magnetic resonance imaging grade. The ease of the procedure and transfer of the methodology will benefit researchers studying disc degeneration.
STUDY DESIGN: An in vivo study to radiographically and histologically assess a new method of induction of disc degeneration. OBJECTIVE.: To establish a reproducible rabbit model of disc degeneration by puncturing the anulus with needles of defined gauges and to compare it to the classic stab model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: New treatment approaches to disc degeneration are of great interest. Although animal models for disc degenerative disease exist, the quantitative measurement of disease progression remains difficult. A reproducible, progressive disc degeneration model, which can be induced in a reasonable time frame, is essential for development of new therapeutic interventions. METHODS: The classic anular stab model and the new needle puncture model were used in the rabbit. For the needle puncture model, 3 different gauges of needle (16G, 18G, and 21G) were used to induce an injury to the disc to a depth of 5 mm. Radiographic and histologic analyses were performed; magnetic resonance images were also assessed in the needle puncture model. RESULTS: Significant disc space narrowing was observed as early as 2 weeks after stabbing in the classic stab model; there was no further narrowing of the disc space. In the needle puncture model, all needle sizes tested induced a slower and more progressive decrease in disc height than in the classic stab model. The magnetic resonance imaging supported the results of disc height data. CONCLUSIONS: The needle puncture approach, using 16G to 21G needles, resulted in a reproducible decrease of disc height and magnetic resonance imaging grade. The ease of the procedure and transfer of the methodology will benefit researchers studying disc degeneration.
Authors: Michael B Ellman; Jae-Sung Kim; Howard S An; Jeffrey S Kroin; Xin Li; Di Chen; Dongyao Yan; Doug D Buechter; Keiichi Nakayama; Bo Liu; Stephanie Morgan; Hee-Jeong Im Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2011-12-12
Authors: Ganjun Feng; Zhanpeng Zhang; Xiaobing Jin; Jiang Hu; Melanie J Gupte; Jeremy M Holzwarth; Peter X Ma Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2012-08-08 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: B P Bechara; S K Leckie; B W Bowman; C E Davies; B I Woods; E Kanal; G A Sowa; J D Kang Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-06-25 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Christoph J Siepe; Franziska Heider; Elisabeth Haas; Wolfgang Hitzl; Ulrike Szeimies; Axel Stäbler; Christoph Weiler; Andreas G Nerlich; Michael H Mayer Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2012-05-29 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Yejia Zhang; Susan Drapeau; S An Howard; Eugene J M A Thonar; D Greg Anderson Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Steven K Leckie; Gwendolyn A Sowa; Bernard P Bechara; Robert A Hartman; Joao Paulo Coelho; William T Witt; Qing D Dong; Brent W Bowman; Kevin M Bell; Nam V Vo; Brian C Kramer; James D Kang Journal: Spine J Date: 2013-02-04 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: Oscar Alvarez-Garcia; Tokio Matsuzaki; Merissa Olmer; Koichi Masuda; Martin K Lotz Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2017-05-04 Impact factor: 3.494