Literature DB >> 15625817

Bi-directional nasal delivery of aerosols can prevent lung deposition.

Per Gisle Djupesland1, Arne Skretting, Mette Winderen, Trond Holand.   

Abstract

Nasal delivery of drugs and vaccines has important advantages compared to injection and oral administration, and is being considered for a widening range of vaccines and substances with topical and systemic action. Traditional nasal delivery technologies are, however, trapped in the dilemma between achieving improved nasal distribution and limiting deposition in the lower airways. The novel bi-directional nasal delivery concept takes advantage of the posterior connection between the nasal passages persisting when the soft palate automatically closes during oral exhalation. Exhalation into the delivery device triggers release of liquid or powder particles into an airflow, which enters one nostril via a sealing nozzle and exits through the other nostril. In a study of 16 healthy subjects using 99mTc labeled nebulized particles with a mean particle size of 3.5 microm, delivery with this novel concept showed no or minimal lung deposition (0.8 +/- 2.0% (range -4.1% to 5.6%) for bi-directional delivery, whereas significant fractions were deposited in the lungs in all 16 subjects (mean 22.3 +/- 8.1%, range 12.2-39.3%) following conventional nasal inhalation (p < 0.0005). In the latter case, the fraction deposited in the lungs correlated significantly (r2 = 0.47, p < 0.004) with the volume of the nasal passages. The bi-directional nasal delivery concept minimizes the risks and problems related to lung deposition occurring during conventional nasal inhalation from a nebulizer and opens up a new range of opportunities for nasal delivery of drugs and vaccines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15625817     DOI: 10.1089/jam.2004.17.249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Aerosol Med        ISSN: 0894-2684


  16 in total

1.  Trigeminal pathways deliver a low molecular weight drug from the nose to the brain and orofacial structures.

Authors:  Neil J Johnson; Leah R Hanson; William H Frey
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 2.  Challenges Associated with Route of Administration in Neonatal Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Matthew W Linakis; Jessica K Roberts; Anita C Lala; Michael G Spigarelli; Natalie J Medlicott; David M Reith; Robert M Ward; Catherine M T Sherwin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Enhanced brain targeting efficiency of intranasally administered plasmid DNA: an alternative route for brain gene therapy.

Authors:  In-Kwon Han; Mi Young Kim; Hyang-Min Byun; Tae Sun Hwang; Jung Mogg Kim; Kwang Woo Hwang; Tae Gwan Park; Woon-Won Jung; Taehoon Chun; Gil-Jae Jeong; Yu-Kyoung Oh
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Microparticles based on chitosan/pectin polyelectrolyte complexes for nasal delivery of tacrine hydrochloride.

Authors:  Bruno Saladini; Federica Bigucci; Teresa Cerchiara; Maria Caterina Gallucci; Barbara Luppi
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 5.  Intranasal immunization with dry powder vaccines.

Authors:  Tania F Bahamondez-Canas; Zhengrong Cui
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Biopharm       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 5.571

6.  Direct nose-to-brain transfer of morphine after nasal administration to rats.

Authors:  Ulrika Espefält Westin; Emma Boström; Johan Gråsjö; Margareta Hammarlund-Udenaes; Erik Björk
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of breath powered nasal delivery of sumatriptan powder (AVP-825) in the treatment of acute migraine (The TARGET Study).

Authors:  Roger K Cady; Peter J McAllister; Egilius L H Spierings; John Messina; Jennifer Carothers; Per G Djupesland; Ramy A Mahmoud
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 5.887

Review 8.  Breath powered nasal delivery: a new route to rapid headache relief.

Authors:  Per G Djupesland; John C Messina; Ramy A Mahmoud
Journal:  Headache       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.887

9.  Nasal drug delivery devices: characteristics and performance in a clinical perspective-a review.

Authors:  Per Gisle Djupesland
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 4.617

10.  Numerical optimization of targeted delivery of charged nanoparticles to the ostiomeatal complex for treatment of rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Jinxiang Xi; Jiayao Eddie Yuan; Xiuhua April Si; James Hasbany
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2015-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.