PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in endometrial cancer patients with a dual-tracer procedure after hysteroscopic peritumoural injection. METHODS: Twenty-six women with previously untreated endometrial adenocarcinoma underwent the hysteroscopic injection of 111 MBq 99mTc-Nanocoll and blue dye administered subendometrially around the lesion. On the same day, all 26 patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy, followed 3-4 h later by hysterotomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy was also performed in cases of either serous or papillary carcinoma (n=7/26). All SLNs were removed and examined with haematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemical techniques. RESULTS: The procedure was well tolerated by patients, only two experiencing transient vagal symptoms. The sensitivity of this technique for correct identification of SLNs was 100%. Lymph node metastases were found in 4 out of the 26 patients (15%), bilaterally in the external iliac region (n=1), unilaterally in the external iliac region (n=1), unilaterally in the common iliac region (n=1) and unilaterally in the para-aortic region (n=1). In all four cases, nodal metastases were located within SLNs detected by lymphoscintigraphy. Only 10 of the 26 patients (38%) had significant blue dye staining. All blue-stained SLNs were radioactive. CONCLUSION: In patients with endometrial cancer, it is feasible to use lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy to define the topographic distribution of the lymphatic network and also to accurately detect lumbo-aortic and pelvic metastases within SLNs. In the majority of patients with early stage endometrial cancer, this procedure may avoid unnecessary radical pelvic lymphadenectomy. It may also guide para-aortic lymph node dissection on the basis of the SLN status.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in endometrial cancerpatients with a dual-tracer procedure after hysteroscopic peritumoural injection. METHODS: Twenty-six women with previously untreated endometrial adenocarcinoma underwent the hysteroscopic injection of 111 MBq 99mTc-Nanocoll and blue dye administered subendometrially around the lesion. On the same day, all 26 patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy, followed 3-4 h later by hysterotomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Para-aortic lymphadenectomy was also performed in cases of either serous or papillary carcinoma (n=7/26). All SLNs were removed and examined with haematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemical techniques. RESULTS: The procedure was well tolerated by patients, only two experiencing transient vagal symptoms. The sensitivity of this technique for correct identification of SLNs was 100%. Lymph node metastases were found in 4 out of the 26 patients (15%), bilaterally in the external iliac region (n=1), unilaterally in the external iliac region (n=1), unilaterally in the common iliac region (n=1) and unilaterally in the para-aortic region (n=1). In all four cases, nodal metastases were located within SLNs detected by lymphoscintigraphy. Only 10 of the 26 patients (38%) had significant blue dye staining. All blue-stained SLNs were radioactive. CONCLUSION: In patients with endometrial cancer, it is feasible to use lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy to define the topographic distribution of the lymphatic network and also to accurately detect lumbo-aortic and pelvic metastases within SLNs. In the majority of patients with early stage endometrial cancer, this procedure may avoid unnecessary radical pelvic lymphadenectomy. It may also guide para-aortic lymph node dissection on the basis of the SLN status.
Authors: Naomi Alazraki; Edwin C Glass; Frank Castronovo; Renato A Valdés Olmos; Donald Podoloff Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: A Obermair; M Geramou; F Gucer; U Denison; A H Graf; E Kapshammer; W Neunteufel; I Frech; A Kaider; C Kainz Journal: Cancer Date: 2000-01-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Susanne H Estourgie; Omgo E Nieweg; Renato A Valdés Olmos; Cornelis A Hoefnagel; Bin B R Kroon Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: T Kasamatsu; T Onda; N Katsumata; M Sawada; T Yamada; R Tsunematsu; K Ohmi; Y Sasajima; Y Matsuno Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2003-01-27 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Pamela T Soliman; Michael Frumovitz; Whitney Spannuth; Marilyn J Greer; Sheena Sharma; Kathleen M Schmeler; Pedro T Ramirez; Charles F Levenback; Lois M Ramondetta Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2010-08-12 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Stephen P Povoski; Ryan L Neff; Cathy M Mojzisik; David M O'Malley; George H Hinkle; Nathan C Hall; Douglas A Murrey; Michael V Knopp; Edward W Martin Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2009-01-27 Impact factor: 2.754
Authors: Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Fady Khoury-Collado; Neeta Pandit-Taskar; Robert A Soslow; Fanny Dao; Yukio Sonoda; Douglas A Levine; Carol L Brown; Dennis S Chi; Richard R Barakat; Mary L Gemignani Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2009-02-20 Impact factor: 5.482