BACKGROUND: An overview of the validity of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients suspected to have traumatic aortic injury (TAI). METHODS: Computerized bibliographic search of trials from 1994 to 2002 evaluating the use of TEE to confirm the diagnosis of TAI. Seven relevant studies out of 204 were identified, involving 758 patients. The accuracy of TEE was analyzed by constructing summary receiver-operating characteristic (sROC) curves and computing areas under the sROC curve. RESULTS: No prospective randomized trial was found. Although accuracy varied greatly, summary ROC curve found that TEE enjoyed a high diagnostic performance. Some study characteristics can affect accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings seems to indicate that TEE is a valuable tool for diagnosing TAI, and its use as first-line evaluation of such patients can be supported; however, given the lack of randomized trials, no standard of care can be drawn from the present overview: future studies should look at this problem more carefully, and should be methodologically rigorous.
BACKGROUND: An overview of the validity of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in patients suspected to have traumatic aortic injury (TAI). METHODS: Computerized bibliographic search of trials from 1994 to 2002 evaluating the use of TEE to confirm the diagnosis of TAI. Seven relevant studies out of 204 were identified, involving 758 patients. The accuracy of TEE was analyzed by constructing summary receiver-operating characteristic (sROC) curves and computing areas under the sROC curve. RESULTS: No prospective randomized trial was found. Although accuracy varied greatly, summary ROC curve found that TEE enjoyed a high diagnostic performance. Some study characteristics can affect accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings seems to indicate that TEE is a valuable tool for diagnosing TAI, and its use as first-line evaluation of such patients can be supported; however, given the lack of randomized trials, no standard of care can be drawn from the present overview: future studies should look at this problem more carefully, and should be methodologically rigorous.