Literature DB >> 15625449

The tip of the iceberg for child abuse: the critical roles of the pediatric trauma service and its registry.

David C Chang1, Vinita Knight, Susan Ziegfeld, Adil Haider, Dawn Warfield, Charles Paidas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The incidence of child abuse is approximately 10% of all children presenting to an emergency department (ED), with a mortality rate less than 1%. By contrast, the characteristics of the subset of abused children presenting to a pediatric trauma service (PTS) is not well defined.
METHODS: This study was a retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected information from an urban Level I pediatric trauma registry from 1990 to 2002 (n = 11,919). Child abuse cases and their perpetrators were identified by E-codes. Patterns of injuries were examined by integer International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes, and diagnostic model was evaluated by discrimination and goodness-of-fit.
RESULTS: A total of 171 cases of child abuse (1.4%) were identified, and the majority were boys (59%, p > 0.05 vs. nonabuse cases). The median age of the abused cohort was younger than 1 year old, and the number of abuse cases did not differ over time (mean, 11 per year.) Abused children present with a higher median Injury Severity Score (10 vs. 4, p < 0.01), more severe injuries of the head and integument, longer hospital lengths of stay (4 vs. 1 day, p < 0.01), and a higher mortality rate (12% vs. 2%, p < 0.01). The following variables emerged with significant association to abuse: fracture of base or vault of skull, contusion of eye, rib fracture, intracranial bleeding, multiple burns, and age. A new Diagnostic Index for Physical Child Abuse was created.
CONCLUSION: Significant characteristics of the abused children in this pediatric trauma service include higher Injury Severity Score (especially in the head and integument), requirement for longer lengths of stay, and a nearly 10-times higher risk of death compared with the ED population. The Diagnostic Index for Physical Child Abuse is proposed as a new tool to assist in the identification of child abuse among pediatric trauma patients. An epidemiologic triangle for child abuse is described, with different prevalence and severity of child abuse seen at different levels of our health care system, starting with primary care providers, followed by the ED, the PTS, and ultimately the medical examiners. The number of cases decreases from the bottom to the top of the health care system, but the mortality rate increases as abuse escalates through the triangle. This establishes the PTS as possibly the final gatekeeper before an abused case becomes a fatality. These data emphasize the need for rigorous registry evaluation and subsequent evidence-based prevention initiatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15625449     DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000145076.05111.e1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  11 in total

1.  Head injury pattern in children can help differentiate accidental from non-accidental trauma.

Authors:  Jonathan P Roach; Shannon N Acker; Denis D Bensard; Andrew P Sirotnak; Frederick M Karrer; David A Partrick
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 1.827

2.  Association of Friday School Report Card Release With Saturday Incidence Rates of Agency-Verified Physical Child Abuse.

Authors:  Melissa A Bright; Sarah D Lynne; Katherine E Masyn; Marcus R Waldman; Julia Graber; Randell Alexander
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 16.193

3.  Use of skeletal surveys to evaluate for physical abuse: analysis of 703 consecutive skeletal surveys.

Authors:  Shanna O Duffy; Janet Squires; Janet B Fromkin; Rachel P Berger
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  Abusive Head Trauma and Mortality-An Analysis From an International Comparative Effectiveness Study of Children With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Nikki Miller Ferguson; Ajit Sarnaik; Darryl Miles; Nadeem Shafi; Mark J Peters; Edward Truemper; Monica S Vavilala; Michael J Bell; Stephen R Wisniewski; James F Luther; Adam L Hartman; Patrick M Kochanek
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Randomized prospective study to evaluate child abuse documentation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Elisabeth Guenther; Cody Olsen; Heather Keenan; Cynthia Newberry; J Michael Dean; Lenora M Olson
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  Potential Child Abuse Screening in Emergency Department; a Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Authors:  Hossein Dinpanah; Abazar Akbarzadeh Pasha
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2017-01-08

7.  Hospital based emergency department visits attributed to child physical abuse in United States: predictors of in-hospital mortality.

Authors:  Veerajalandhar Allareddy; Rahimullah Asad; Min Kyeong Lee; Romesh P Nalliah; Sankeerth Rampa; David G Speicher; Alexandre T Rotta; Veerasathpurush Allareddy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A profile of suspected child abuse as a subgroup of major trauma patients.

Authors:  Ffion C Davies; Timothy J Coats; Ross Fisher; Thomas Lawrence; Fiona E Lecky
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Identifying non-accidental fractures in children aged <2 years.

Authors:  Laura A Leaman; William L Hennrikus; James J Bresnahan
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 1.548

10.  Analysis of acute presentations for child protection medical assessments in a large, culturally diverse metropolitan setting.

Authors:  Paul Rex Hotton; Shanti Raman
Journal:  BMJ Paediatr Open       Date:  2017-09-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.