Literature DB >> 15625354

Medical research funding may have over-expanded and be due for collapse.

B G Charlton1, P Andras.   

Abstract

The continual and uninterrupted expansion of medical research funding is generally assumed to be a permanent feature of modern societies, but this expectation may turn out to be mistaken. Sciences tend to go through boom and bust phases. Twentieth century physics is an example where huge increases in funding followed an era of scientific breakthroughs. Speculative over-expansion led to diminishing returns on investment, then a collapse in funding. We predict that medicine will follow the same trajectory. After prolonged over-funding of the 'basic-to-applied' model of clinical innovation, and a progressive shift towards Big Science organization, medical research has become increasingly inefficient and ineffective. Although incremental improvements to existing treatment strategies continue, the rate of significant therapeutic breakthroughs has been declining for three decades. Medical science now requires rationalization and modernization. From this perspective, the current level of medical research funding looks like a bubble due to burst.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15625354     DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hci003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  QJM        ISSN: 1460-2393


  6 in total

1.  Five futures for academic medicine: specialised professional research system of "pure" medical science is needed.

Authors:  Bruce Charlton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-09-24

Review 2.  British academic ophthalmology in crisis.

Authors:  J M Sparrow
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  The need for a new specialist professional research system of "pure" medical science.

Authors:  Bruce G Charlton; Peter Andras
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-08-30       Impact factor: 11.069

4.  Welcome to beautiful mind; a call to action.

Authors:  Fatemeh Heidary; Reza Gharebaghi
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2012

Review 5.  Analysis of arterial intimal hyperplasia: review and hypothesis.

Authors:  Vladimir M Subbotin
Journal:  Theor Biol Med Model       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 2.432

6.  Institutional operating figures in basic and applied sciences: scientometric analysis of quantitative output benchmarking.

Authors:  Beatrix Groneberg-Kloft; Cristian Scutaru; Carolin Kreiter; Silvana Kölzow; Axel Fischer; David Quarcoo
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2008-06-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.