Literature DB >> 15625332

Pegaptanib for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Evangelos S Gragoudas1, Anthony P Adamis, Emmett T Cunningham, Matthew Feinsod, David R Guyer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pegaptanib, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy, was evaluated in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
METHODS: We conducted two concurrent, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, dose-ranging, controlled clinical trials using broad entry criteria. Intravitreous injection into one eye per patient of pegaptanib (at a dose of 0.3 mg, 1.0 mg, or 3.0 mg) or sham injections were administered every 6 weeks over a period of 48 weeks. The primary end point was the proportion of patients who had lost fewer than 15 letters of visual acuity at 54 weeks.
RESULTS: In the combined analysis of the primary end point (for a total of 1186 patients), efficacy was demonstrated, without a dose-response relationship, for all three doses of pegaptanib (P<0.001 for the comparison of 0.3 mg with sham injection; P<0.001 for the comparison of 1.0 mg with sham injection; and P=0.03 for the comparison of 3.0 mg with sham injection). In the group given pegaptanib at 0.3 mg, 70 percent of patients lost fewer than 15 letters of visual acuity, as compared with 55 percent among the controls (P<0.001). The risk of severe loss of visual acuity (loss of 30 letters or more) was reduced from 22 percent in the sham-injection group to 10 percent in the group receiving 0.3 mg of pegaptanib (P<0.001). More patients receiving pegaptanib (0.3 mg), as compared with sham injection, maintained their visual acuity or gained acuity (33 percent vs. 23 percent; P=0.003). As early as six weeks after beginning therapy with the study drug, and at all subsequent points, the mean visual acuity among patients receiving 0.3 mg of pegaptanib was better than in those receiving sham injections (P<0.002). Among the adverse events that occurred, endophthalmitis (in 1.3 percent of patients), traumatic injury to the lens (in 0.7 percent), and retinal detachment (in 0.6 percent) were the most serious and required vigilance. These events were associated with a severe loss of visual acuity in 0.1 percent of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Pegaptanib appears to be an effective therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Its long-term safety is not known. Copyright 2004 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15625332     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa042760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  574 in total

Review 1.  Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for macular edema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Tasanee Braithwaite; Afshan A Nanji; Paul B Greenberg
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

2.  Parstatin suppresses ocular neovascularization and inflammation.

Authors:  Hu Huang; Panagiotis Vasilakis; Xiufeng Zhong; Ji-Kui Shen; Katerina Geronatsiou; Helen Papadaki; Michael E Maragoudakis; Sotirios P Gartaganis; Stanley A Vinores; Nikos E Tsopanoglou
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 3.  Treating metastatic cancer with nanotechnology.

Authors:  Avi Schroeder; Daniel A Heller; Monte M Winslow; James E Dahlman; George W Pratt; Robert Langer; Tyler Jacks; Daniel G Anderson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 4.  Vascular normalization as a therapeutic strategy for malignant and nonmalignant disease.

Authors:  Shom Goel; Andus Hon-Kit Wong; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 5.  Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for diabetic macular edema.

Authors:  David S Boyer; J Jill Hopkins; Jonathan Sorof; Jason S Ehrlich
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.565

Review 6.  Endothelial nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and angiogenesis.

Authors:  John P Cooke; Yohannes T Ghebremariam
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 6.677

Review 7.  Clinical pharmacology of intravitreal anti-VEGF drugs.

Authors:  Stefano Fogli; Marzia Del Re; Eleonora Rofi; Chiara Posarelli; Michele Figus; Romano Danesi
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 8.  A review of anti-VEGF agents for proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  P Osaadon; X J Fagan; T Lifshitz; J Levy
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 9.  The therapeutic potential of intraocular depot steroid systems: developments aimed at prolonging duration of efficacy.

Authors:  Martin M Nentwich; Michael W Ulbig
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 5.594

10.  Targeted deletion of Vegfa in adult mice induces vision loss.

Authors:  Toshihide Kurihara; Peter D Westenskow; Stephen Bravo; Edith Aguilar; Martin Friedlander
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.