Literature DB >> 15624514

Magnetic resonance evaluation of the presence of an extensive intraductal component in breast cancer.

O Ikeda1, R Nishimura, H Miyayama, T Yasunaga, Y Ozaki, A Tsuji, Y Yamashita.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether the presence of extensive intraductal components (EIC) in breast carcinomas can be accurately evaluated on magnetic resonance (MR) images.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety-three women with breast cancer, aged between 32 and 79 years (mean 54 years), underwent three-dimensional dynamic MR imaging (dyMRI) with fat suppression and magnetization transfer contrast before breast-conserving surgery. The tumors were classified on dyMRI as circumscribed, microlobulated, and/or speculated, and their size was measured. Spotty or linear continuous enhancement (SLE) from the main tumor to the nipple and segmental enhancement surrounding the main tumor (SE) were considered indicative of intraductal tumor spread. The correlation between preoperative MRI and macroscopic and microscopic findings was examined.
RESULTS: On MR images, the tumor sizes ranged from 0.8 to 3.4 cm. These measurements coincided with histologic measurements in circumscribed tumors. However, in tumors with microlobulated or spiculated borders, tumor size tended to be underestimated on MR images. Of 93 patients, 59 (63.4%) had histologically confirmed EIC; 42 of the 59 cancers (71.2%) manifested SLE or SE on MR images. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MR imaging in detecting EIC were 71%, 85%, and 76%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging facilitates the detection of EIC in breast masses. This information is valuable for the planning of breast-conserving surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15624514     DOI: 10.1080/02841850410001349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  8 in total

1.  Breast Cancer OncoGuia.

Authors:  Paula Manchon; Josep M Borràs; Tàrsila Ferro; Josep Alfons Espinàs
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Multifocal, multicentric and contralateral breast cancers: breast MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  V Girardi; G Carbognin; L Camera; I Baglio; A Bucci; F Bonetti; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  [Magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging for breast cancer: pros and contras].

Authors:  C K Kuhl; M Braun
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Radiopathological features predictive of involved margins in ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  D M Layfield; H See; M Stahnke; L Hayward; R I Cutress; R S Oeppen
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Role of breast magnetic resonance imaging in predicting malignant invasion of the nipple-areolar complex: Potential predictors and reliability between inter-observers.

Authors:  Chiung-Ying Liao; Yu-Ting Wu; Wen-Pei Wu; Chih-Jung Chen; Hwa-Koon Wu; Ying-Jen Lin; Shou-Tung Chen; Dar-Ren Chen; Chi-Wei Lee; Shu-Ling Chen; Shou-Jen Kuo; Hung-Wen Lai
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Evaluation of Breast Cancer Size Measurement by Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) and a Radiologist on Breast MRI.

Authors:  Ji Yeon Park
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging in size assessment of invasive breast carcinoma with an extensive intraductal component.

Authors:  Arjan P Schouten van der Velden; Carla Boetes; Peter Bult; Theo Wobbes
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 1.930

8.  Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging.

Authors:  R M Mann; C K Kuhl; K Kinkel; C Boetes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.