BACKGROUND: Immunophenotyping of whole blood (WB) and isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) is a common tool used to evaluate immune system changes in clinical studies. The development of methods that would allow preservation of samples for flow cytometric analysis is important for the extension of this technology to field testing in settings where the equipment might be not readily accessible. METHODS: Three-color flow cytometric analysis was used to determine percentages of T cells and their subsets (CD3(+), CD4(+), CD8(+)), B cells (CD19(+)), and natural killer cells (CD16(+)/56(+)) in WB and PBMCs using variations of a standard stain/fix WB staining procedure (Optilyse) that included staining following fixation and freezing of fixed samples before or after staining. RESULTS: Comparable lymphocyte subset percentages in WB or PBMCs were observed regardless of Optliyse method used (all Ps >/= 0.8). However, differences in fluorescence intensity for several markers were observed across procedures. Compared with the standard stain/fix procedures, fix/stain decreased the mean fluorescence intensities for CD4, CD8, CD19 and CD16/56 in WB and PBMCs (P </= 0.03 for these markers P = 0.105 for CD8 in PBMCs). Further decreases in mean fluorescence intensity were seen with the fix/stain/freeze procedure. The stain/fix/freeze yielded intensities largely comparable to those seen with standard stain/fix procedure (P >/= 0.13), suggesting that, when the markers of interest are known at the time of field collection, implementation of this procedure might be desirable. Fix/freeze/stain resulted in diminution of intensity in general, but they tended to be more modest than those seen for fix/stain/freeze and therefore might be applicable to field studies in instances when the specific markers of interest cannot be defined upfront. CONCLUSIONS: Freezing of fixed WB and PBMCs before or after cell surface staining is a reliable method for preserving specimens in field sites for later determination of lymphocyte subset percentages, which are commonly assessed in immunodeficient and cancer patients. (c) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: Immunophenotyping of whole blood (WB) and isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) is a common tool used to evaluate immune system changes in clinical studies. The development of methods that would allow preservation of samples for flow cytometric analysis is important for the extension of this technology to field testing in settings where the equipment might be not readily accessible. METHODS: Three-color flow cytometric analysis was used to determine percentages of T cells and their subsets (CD3(+), CD4(+), CD8(+)), B cells (CD19(+)), and natural killer cells (CD16(+)/56(+)) in WB and PBMCs using variations of a standard stain/fix WB staining procedure (Optilyse) that included staining following fixation and freezing of fixed samples before or after staining. RESULTS: Comparable lymphocyte subset percentages in WB or PBMCs were observed regardless of Optliyse method used (all Ps >/= 0.8). However, differences in fluorescence intensity for several markers were observed across procedures. Compared with the standard stain/fix procedures, fix/stain decreased the mean fluorescence intensities for CD4, CD8, CD19 and CD16/56 in WB and PBMCs (P </= 0.03 for these markers P = 0.105 for CD8 in PBMCs). Further decreases in mean fluorescence intensity were seen with the fix/stain/freeze procedure. The stain/fix/freeze yielded intensities largely comparable to those seen with standard stain/fix procedure (P >/= 0.13), suggesting that, when the markers of interest are known at the time of field collection, implementation of this procedure might be desirable. Fix/freeze/stain resulted in diminution of intensity in general, but they tended to be more modest than those seen for fix/stain/freeze and therefore might be applicable to field studies in instances when the specific markers of interest cannot be defined upfront. CONCLUSIONS: Freezing of fixed WB and PBMCs before or after cell surface staining is a reliable method for preserving specimens in field sites for later determination of lymphocyte subset percentages, which are commonly assessed in immunodeficient and cancerpatients. (c) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Alfonso J García-Piñeres; Allan Hildesheim; Lori Dodd; Troy J Kemp; Jun Yang; Brandie Fullmer; Clayton Harro; Douglas R Lowy; Richard A Lempicki; Ligia A Pinto Journal: J Immunol Date: 2009-02-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Christopher J Tyler; Tamara Pérez-Jeldres; Erik Ehinger; Brian Capaldo; Thangaraj Karuppuchamy; Joshua D Boyer; Derek Patel; Parambir Dulai; Brigid S Boland; Joanne Lannigan; Lars Eckmann; Peter B Ernst; William J Sandborn; Samuel B Ho; Jesús Rivera-Nieves Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2018-10-12 Impact factor: 7.290
Authors: Ken Matsui; Joseph W Adelsberger; Troy J Kemp; Michael W Baseler; Julie E Ledgerwood; Ligia A Pinto Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Eun Youn Roh; Sue Shin; Jong Hyun Yoon; Sohee Oh; Kyoung Un Park; Nuri Lee; Eun Young Song Journal: Ann Lab Med Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 3.464