Literature DB >> 15624201

Immunophenotypic differences between diagnosis and relapse in childhood AML: Implications for MRD monitoring.

Claudia Langebrake1, Iris Brinkmann, Andrea Teigler-Schlegel, Ursula Creutzig, Frank Griesinger, Ulrike Puhlmann, Dirk Reinhardt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Determination of antigen expression patterns is, in addition to morphologic analysis, essential to the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The present study was performed to determine (a) the degree of changes in immunophenotype and their consequences on the monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) in childhood AML and (b) whether certain clusters of changes in antigen expression patterns exist between diagnosis and relapse.
METHODS: Bone marrow specimens of 48 children enrolled in the German AML-BFM-93/98 (Acute Myeloid Leukemia-Berlin-Frankfurt-Munster) studies were analyzed immunologically, morphologically, and genetically at diagnosis and at first relapse.
RESULTS: The immunophenotypes by flow cytometry differed by at least one antigen between samples at presentation and relapse in 42 of 48 children (88%). More children displayed an immature phenotype at relapse (43 of 47, 91.5%, vs. 37 of 48, 77%; P = 0.05) with expression of CD34 and/or CD117. This was reflected by a gain of markers that are associated with lineage immaturity in 18 of 25 (72%) of cases, whereas the loss of such antigens was observed in 6 of 25 (24%) patients. We did not observe significant changes for lineage specific markers, with comparable occurrences of loss or gain of myeloid and lymphoid antigens in the sample pairs. Only minimal changes were seen for morphologic and genetic features.
CONCLUSION: An antigenic shift was observed in 88% of cases in this study. The antibody panels used for MRD monitoring in childhood AML should therefore not be restricted to the immunophenotype detected at presentation but should include in particular markers of lineage immaturity. The clinical observation of a shift toward a more immature phenotype of the myeloblasts is consistent with the model of a clonal evolution of a leukemic stem cell. (c) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15624201     DOI: 10.1002/cyto.b.20037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytometry B Clin Cytom        ISSN: 1552-4949            Impact factor:   3.058


  17 in total

Review 1.  X-linked clonality testing: interpretation and limitations.

Authors:  George L Chen; Josef T Prchal
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  BCR-ABL1 and CD66c exhibit high concordance in minimal residual disease detection of adult B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  Gu-Sheng Tang; Jun Wu; Min Liu; Hui Chen; Shen-Glan Gong; Jian-Min Yang; Xiao-Xia Hu; Jian-Min Wang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 3.  Multi-color flow cytometric immunophenotyping for detection of minimal residual disease in AML: past, present and future.

Authors:  J M Jaso; S A Wang; J L Jorgensen; P Lin
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 4.  Minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukemia--current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Sabine Kayser; Roland B Walter; Wendy Stock; Richard F Schlenk
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 5.  Diagnosis of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias and Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease by Multiparametric Flow Cytometry.

Authors:  Kah Teong Soh; Joseph D Tario; Paul K Wallace
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.935

Review 6.  Minimal/Measurable Residual Disease Detection in Acute Leukemias by Multiparameter Flow Cytometry.

Authors:  Franklin Fuda; Weina Chen
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 7.  Minimal residual disease in acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Christopher S Hourigan; Judith E Karp
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 8.  Advancing the Minimal Residual Disease Concept in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Authors:  Peter Hokland; Hans B Ommen; Matthew P Mulé; Christopher S Hourigan
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.851

Review 9.  How and why minimal residual disease studies are necessary in leukemia: a review from WP10 and WP12 of the European LeukaemiaNet.

Authors:  Marie C Béné; Jaspal S Kaeda
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 9.941

10.  Comparative proteomics in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Magdalena Luczak; Maciej Kaźmierczak; Luiza Hadschuh; Krzysztof Lewandowski; Mieczysław Komarnicki; Marek Figlerowicz
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2012-05-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.