OBJECTIVES: Although sick, some people take no time off work, a phenomenon called "sickness presenteeism." This study examined the association between sickness presenteeism and incidence of serious coronary events. METHODS: The analyses were based on a cohort of 5071 male British civil servants without previous myocardial infarction. Baseline screening included measurements of health status and coronary risk factors. Absence records were assessed for the 3 years subsequent to baseline screening. The outcome of interest was incident nonfatal myocardial infarction or fatal coronary heart disease (mean length of follow-up=9.1 years). RESULTS: Seventeen percent of unhealthy employees took no absence during the 3-year follow-up. Their incidence of serious coronary events was twice as high as that of the unhealthy employees with moderate levels of sickness absenteeism (after adjustment for conventional risk factors, hazard ratio 1.97, 95% confidence interval=1.02, 3.83). CONCLUSIONS: Employers and employees should be aware of the potential harmful effects caused by sickness presenteeism.
OBJECTIVES: Although sick, some people take no time off work, a phenomenon called "sickness presenteeism." This study examined the association between sickness presenteeism and incidence of serious coronary events. METHODS: The analyses were based on a cohort of 5071 male British civil servants without previous myocardial infarction. Baseline screening included measurements of health status and coronary risk factors. Absence records were assessed for the 3 years subsequent to baseline screening. The outcome of interest was incident nonfatal myocardial infarction or fatal coronary heart disease (mean length of follow-up=9.1 years). RESULTS: Seventeen percent of unhealthy employees took no absence during the 3-year follow-up. Their incidence of serious coronary events was twice as high as that of the unhealthy employees with moderate levels of sickness absenteeism (after adjustment for conventional risk factors, hazard ratio 1.97, 95% confidence interval=1.02, 3.83). CONCLUSIONS: Employers and employees should be aware of the potential harmful effects caused by sickness presenteeism.
Authors: A Rozanski; C N Bairey; D S Krantz; J Friedman; K J Resser; M Morell; S Hilton-Chalfen; L Hestrin; J Bietendorf; D S Berman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1988-04-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M G Marmot; G D Smith; S Stansfeld; C Patel; F North; J Head; I White; E Brunner; A Feeney Journal: Lancet Date: 1991-06-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Constanze Leineweber; Hugo Westerlund; Jan Hagberg; Pia Svedberg; Kristina Alexanderson Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: L Ala-Mursula; J Vahtera; A Kouvonen; A Väänänen; A Linna; J Pentti; M Kivimäki Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2006-05-25 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Gunnar Bergström; Lennart Bodin; Jan Hagberg; Tomas Lindh; Gunnar Aronsson; Malin Josephson Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2009-06-06 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Paul Maurice Conway; Thomas Clausen; Åse Marie Hansen; Annie Hogh Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2015-05-03 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Gerod Sharper Hall; Sarah Walters; Christopher Wimer; Amber Levanon Seligson; Matthew Maury; Jane Waldfogel; L Hannah Gould; Sungwoo Lim Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2018-02 Impact factor: 3.671