Literature DB >> 15623801

Grating acuity at different luminances in wild-type mice and in mice lacking rod or cone function.

Christine Schmucker1, Mathias Seeliger, Pete Humphries, Martin Biel, Frank Schaeffel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The mouse eye has become an important model in vision research. However, it is not known how visual acuity changes with luminance. Therefore, grating acuity of mice was measured at different luminances in an automated optomotor paradigm. Furthermore, mutant mice lacking either rods (RHO-/- and CNGB1-/-) or cones (CNGA3-/-), or both, were studied to determine the rod and cone contribution to visual acuity.
METHODS: Freely ranging individual mice were automatically tracked at a 25-Hz sampling rate with a self-programmed video system in a large rotating optomotor drum. The drum had a square-wave grating inside with adjustable spatial frequency. The angular speed of the mice with respect to the center of the drum and the angular orientation of the snout-tail body axis were analyzed. In addition, the motor activity of the wild-type mice was recorded at different luminances.
RESULTS: The optomotor drum provided reliable data on visual input to the mouse's behavior and was convenient to use, since the experimenter's had only to place the mice individually in a Perspex cylinder. Optomotor grating acuity of the wild-type mice was limited to 0.3 to 0.4 cyc/deg. Maximum optomotor responses were obtained at 0.1 to 0.2 cyc/deg. The importance of visual input declined monotonically with decreasing luminance (30 cd/m2, 100%; 0.1 cd/m2, 76.4%; 0.005 cd/m2, 45.9%; and darkness, -9%). Mice lacking functional rods were able to resolve gratings up to 0.1 cyc/deg at 30 cd/m2. Surprisingly, mice lacking functional cones had an optomotor acuity that was similar to the wild-type. Double-knockout mice without rods and cones had no detectable grating acuity.
CONCLUSIONS: Because the visual system of the mouse is more responsive at bright luminances, experiments in which visual input is important should be performed in photopic conditions (30 cd/m2 or even more). Apparently, spatial vision is governed by the rod system, which is not saturated in the mesopic or low photopic range. Mice lacking both rods and cones have no detectable grating acuity, indicating that the retinal melanopsin system does not contribute to spatial vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15623801     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-0959

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  33 in total

1.  Characterization of the 3D angular vestibulo-ocular reflex in C57BL6 mice.

Authors:  Americo A Migliaccio; Robert Meierhofer; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A system to measure the Optokinetic and Optomotor response in mice.

Authors:  Friedrich Kretschmer; Szilard Sajgo; Viola Kretschmer; Tudor C Badea
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Missing optomotor head-turning reflex in the DBA/2J mouse.

Authors:  Peter Barabas; Wei Huang; Hui Chen; Christopher L Koehler; Gareth Howell; Simon W M John; Ning Tian; René C Rentería; David Krizaj
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Modulatory influence of stimulus parameters on optokinetic head-tracking response.

Authors:  Biju B Thomas; Dallas Shi; Kay Khine; Leo A Kim; Srinivas R Sadda
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Activation of Striatal Neurons Causes a Perceptual Decision Bias during Visual Change Detection in Mice.

Authors:  Lupeng Wang; Krsna V Rangarajan; Charles R Gerfen; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Visually-driven ocular growth in mice requires functional rod photoreceptors.

Authors:  Han na Park; Seema B Jabbar; Christopher C Tan; Curran S Sidhu; Jane Abey; Fazila Aseem; Gregor Schmid; P Michael Iuvone; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Lack of cone mediated retinal function increases susceptibility to form-deprivation myopia in mice.

Authors:  Ranjay Chakraborty; Victoria Yang; Han Na Park; Erica G Landis; Susov Dhakal; Cara T Motz; Michael A Bergen; P Michael Iuvone; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 3.467

8.  Behavioral evaluation of visual function of rats using a visual discrimination apparatus.

Authors:  Biju B Thomas; Deedar M Samant; Magdalene J Seiler; Robert B Aramant; Sharzad Sheikholeslami; Kevin Zhang; Zhenhai Chen; SriniVas R Sadda
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Visual Selective Attention in Mice.

Authors:  Lupeng Wang; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  A microarray analysis of retinal transcripts that are controlled by image contrast in mice.

Authors:  Christine Brand; Frank Schaeffel; Marita Pauline Feldkaemper
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 2.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.