PURPOSE: Experimental studies have revealed that fms-like tyrosine kinase (Flt)-4 plays important roles in lymphangiogenesis in malignant tumors, but the clinical significance remains unclear. We assessed Flt-4 expression in tumor cells and in endothelial cells in correlation with clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A total of 206 consecutive patients with resected pathological stage I-IIIA NSCLC were reviewed. Expression of Flt-4 was examined immunohistochemically, and Flt-4-positive microvessels were quantitatively evaluated (Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density). RESULTS: There was no significant correlation between Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density and any characteristic of patients including nodal metastases. A significant correlation between Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density and Flt-4 status in tumor cells was documented (P < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in the mean Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density according to vascular endothelial growth factor-C or -D status in tumor cells. The 5-year survival rate for higher Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density tumor (56.4%) was significantly lower than that of lower Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density tumor (69.0%, P = 0.046); the prognostic significance was enhanced in pIIIA-N2 patients (5-year survival rates, 18.8% for higher Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density tumor and 50.0% for lower Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density tumor, respectively; P = 0.012). A multivariate analysis confirmed that higher Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density was a significant and independent prognostic factor (P = 0.019). CD34-positive vessel density or Flt-4 status in tumor cells was not a significant prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density, not Flt-4 status in tumor cells, was a significant prognostic factor in NSCLC.
PURPOSE: Experimental studies have revealed that fms-like tyrosine kinase (Flt)-4 plays important roles in lymphangiogenesis in malignant tumors, but the clinical significance remains unclear. We assessed Flt-4 expression in tumor cells and in endothelial cells in correlation with clinical outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A total of 206 consecutive patients with resected pathological stage I-IIIA NSCLC were reviewed. Expression of Flt-4 was examined immunohistochemically, and Flt-4-positive microvessels were quantitatively evaluated (Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density). RESULTS: There was no significant correlation between Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density and any characteristic of patients including nodal metastases. A significant correlation between Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density and Flt-4 status in tumor cells was documented (P < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in the mean Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density according to vascular endothelial growth factor-C or -D status in tumor cells. The 5-year survival rate for higher Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density tumor (56.4%) was significantly lower than that of lower Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density tumor (69.0%, P = 0.046); the prognostic significance was enhanced in pIIIA-N2 patients (5-year survival rates, 18.8% for higher Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density tumor and 50.0% for lower Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density tumor, respectively; P = 0.012). A multivariate analysis confirmed that higher Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density was a significant and independent prognostic factor (P = 0.019). CD34-positive vessel density or Flt-4 status in tumor cells was not a significant prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS:Flt-4-positive endothelial cell density, not Flt-4 status in tumor cells, was a significant prognostic factor in NSCLC.
Authors: I Van der Auwera; Y Cao; J C Tille; M S Pepper; D G Jackson; S B Fox; A L Harris; L Y Dirix; P B Vermeulen Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2006-11-21 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Thomas K Kilvaer; Erna-Elise Paulsen; Sigurd M Hald; Tom Wilsgaard; Roy M Bremnes; Lill-Tove Busund; Tom Donnem Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-25 Impact factor: 3.240