Literature DB >> 15622235

From the "charretera" to the supraclavicular fascial island flap: revisitation and further evolution of a controversial flap.

Giovanni Di Benedetto1, Angelica Aquinati, Marina Pierangeli, Alessandro Scalise, Aldo Bertani.   

Abstract

Wide tissue defects located on the face and neck area often require distant flaps or free flaps to achieve a tension-free reconstruction together with an acceptable aesthetic result. The supraclavicular island flap surely represents a versatile and useful flap that can be used in case of large tissue losses. Because of its wide arc of rotation, which ensures a 180-degree mobilization anteriorly and posteriorly, the flap can reach distant sites when harvested as a pure island flap. The main vascular supply of the flap, the supraclavicular artery, a branch of the transverse cervical artery or, less frequently, of the suprascapular artery, though reliable, is not a very large vessel. In some particular cases, when too much tension or angles that are too tight are present, the vascular supply of the flap can be difficult and special care must be taken to avoid flap failure. To avoid this problem, the authors started harvesting the flap not as a pure island flap but with a fascial pedicle, thin and resistant, which ensures good reliability; also, when a higher tension rate is present, it avoids the risk of excessive traction or kinking of the vessels. Twenty-five consecutive patients with various defects located on the head, neck, and thorax area were treated in the past 2 years using the modified supraclavicular island flap. There was no flap loss or distant necrosis of the flap, and there was marginal skin deepithelialization in only two cases, which only required minor surgery. Postoperative morbidity was low, similar to the classic supraclavicular island flap, with primarily closed donor sites, except for one case, and tension-free scars. The authors show how the modified supraclavicular island flap is a reliable and safe flap that gives a good aesthetic result with low risk concerning the viability of the transferred skin. The technique, similar to supraclavicular island flap harvesting, is easy to perform and is attractive in patients at risk for poor or delayed healing such as smokers or patients with complex medical histories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15622235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  8 in total

1.  Burns: treatment and outcomes.

Authors:  Andrew Burd
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Anatomic study on the transverse cervical vessels perforators in the lateral triangle of the neck and harvest of a new flap: the free supraclavicular transverse cervical artery perforator flap.

Authors:  Adriana Cordova; Salvatore D'Arpa; Roberto Pirrello; Erich Brenner; Johannes Jeschke; Francesco Moschella
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF): a rising opportunity for head and neck reconstruction.

Authors:  Leone Giordano; Davide Di Santo; Antonio Occhini; Andrea Galli; Giulia Bertino; Marco Benazzo; Mario Bussi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Post-burn neck contracture: effectively managed with supraclavicular artery flap.

Authors:  H Ali; M Pervez; I Khyani; W Sami; D Muneeb
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2019-12-31

5.  Supraclavicular artery island flap reconstruction of a contralateral partial laryngopharyngeal defect.

Authors:  C Kucur; K Durmus; E Ozer
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.124

6.  The supraclavicular flap for reconstruction of post-burn mentosternal contractures.

Authors:  Shahriar Loghmani; Mohammad Eidy; Mahdi Mohammadzadeh; Alireza Loghmani; Fahimeh Raigan
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 0.611

7.  Versatility of the supraclavicular pedicle flap in head and neck reconstruction.

Authors:  L Giordano; S Bondi; S Toma; M Biafora
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.124

8.  Usefulness of supraclavicular flap in reconstruction following resection of oral cancer.

Authors:  B Vageesh Padiyar; S M Azeem Mohiyuddin; A Sagayaraj; Shuaib Merchant
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-08-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.