OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess whether cooling to 10 degrees C and/or treatment with Cyclosporine A (CsA) can reduce neurological injury during prolonged hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) in a chronic animal model. METHODS: In this blinded study, 24 pigs (20-23 kg) were randomized to HCA for 90 min at 20 degrees C (n=8), at 10 degrees C (n=8), or at 10 degrees C with 5 mg/kg CsA (n=8). CsA (or placebo) were given intravenously before and for 3 days after HCA. Hemodynamics and neurophysiological data were monitored periodically throughout the experiment and for 3 h after HCA, as well as intracranial pressure (ICP), which has been shown to correlate with outcome. Daily neurological/behavioral evaluation (mental status, coordination and appetite; 12=normal and 0=coma or death) was carried out until sacrifice on postoperative day (POD) 3. RESULTS: Overall survival rate was 83.3%: one 20 degrees C control, two 10 degrees C controls, and one 10 degrees C/CsA pig died and were replaced. Basic hemodynamic data revealed no significant differences between groups. ICP differed significantly among the groups during the first 3 h postoperatively (P=0.003 by repeated measures ANOVA); it was higher in the 20 degrees C group than in the 10 degrees C/CsA or 10 degrees C control groups. Recovery of visual evoked potentials was significantly better in the 10 degrees C/CsA group than in the 10 degrees C control group; no recovery was seen by 3 h in the 20 degrees C control group. Postoperative behavioral scores also differed significantly between the groups, P=0.03: a good behavioral outcome--a score >9 on POD3--was more prevalent among CsA-treated pigs (75%) than among 10 degrees C controls (50%), or 20 degrees C controls (12.5%, P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that cooling to 10 degrees C and CsA treatment are both of benefit in improving cerebral recovery after HCA when compared with untreated 20 degrees C controls, and may be synergistic.
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess whether cooling to 10 degrees C and/or treatment with Cyclosporine A (CsA) can reduce neurological injury during prolonged hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA) in a chronic animal model. METHODS: In this blinded study, 24 pigs (20-23 kg) were randomized to HCA for 90 min at 20 degrees C (n=8), at 10 degrees C (n=8), or at 10 degrees C with 5 mg/kg CsA (n=8). CsA (or placebo) were given intravenously before and for 3 days after HCA. Hemodynamics and neurophysiological data were monitored periodically throughout the experiment and for 3 h after HCA, as well as intracranial pressure (ICP), which has been shown to correlate with outcome. Daily neurological/behavioral evaluation (mental status, coordination and appetite; 12=normal and 0=coma or death) was carried out until sacrifice on postoperative day (POD) 3. RESULTS: Overall survival rate was 83.3%: one 20 degrees C control, two 10 degrees C controls, and one 10 degrees C/CsApig died and were replaced. Basic hemodynamic data revealed no significant differences between groups. ICP differed significantly among the groups during the first 3 h postoperatively (P=0.003 by repeated measures ANOVA); it was higher in the 20 degrees C group than in the 10 degrees C/CsA or 10 degrees C control groups. Recovery of visual evoked potentials was significantly better in the 10 degrees C/CsA group than in the 10 degrees C control group; no recovery was seen by 3 h in the 20 degrees C control group. Postoperative behavioral scores also differed significantly between the groups, P=0.03: a good behavioral outcome--a score >9 on POD3--was more prevalent among CsA-treated pigs (75%) than among 10 degrees C controls (50%), or 20 degrees C controls (12.5%, P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that cooling to 10 degrees C and CsA treatment are both of benefit in improving cerebral recovery after HCA when compared with untreated 20 degrees C controls, and may be synergistic.
Authors: Meshe Chonde; Katharyn L Flickinger; Matthew L Sundermann; Allison C Koller; David D Salcido; Cameron Dezfulian; James J Menegazzi; Jonathan Elmer Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2019-06-11 Impact factor: 3.411