Literature DB >> 15621326

Postural steadiness and weight distribution during tandem stance in healthy young and elderly adults.

Erika Jonsson1, Ake Seiger, Helga Hirschfeld.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tandem stance is a clinical measure of standing balance considered to assess postural steadiness in a heel-to-toe position by a temporal measurement. To our knowledge, no studies have evaluated the change of postural steadiness, expressed as force variability, over time. The objective of this paper is to investigate postural steadiness during 30 s of tandem stance in healthy elderly and young adults, and to explore the weight distribution between legs during tandem stance.
METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis comparing ground reaction forces and muscle activity in 26 healthy elderly adults (mean age 70.6 years) and 27 healthy young adults (mean age 30.0 years). Ground reaction forces beneath both feet and muscle activity of ankle muscles were recorded while the subjects performed 30 s of tandem stance during two conditions.
FINDINGS: Two phases were identified in both groups: First a dynamic phase, a decrease in force variability during the first 3-4 s after foot placement, and thereafter a static phase, maintaining a certain level of force variability. Age-related changes were seen in the decrease in force variability (P<0.001) and ankle muscle activity (P<0.001). However, both groups placed more weight on the rear leg (P<0.001).
INTERPRETATION: The first few seconds of tandem stance pose the greatest challenge to postural steadiness and influence the static phase. We suggest that the dynamic phase is the most crucial period of time for assessing balance requirements. Independent of age, tandem stance is not a task for equal weight bearing.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15621326     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)        ISSN: 0268-0033            Impact factor:   2.063


  15 in total

1.  Asymmetry of recurrent dynamics as a function of postural stance.

Authors:  Adam C King; Zheng Wang; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Processing time of addition or withdrawal of single or combined balance-stabilizing haptic and visual information.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Honeine; Oscar Crisafulli; Stefania Sozzi; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Effects of distance and gaze position on postural stability in young and old subjects.

Authors:  Zoï Kapoula; Thanh-Thuan Lê
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The effects of foot position and orientation on inter- and intra-foot coordination in standing postures: a frequency domain PCA analysis.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Peter C M Molenaar; Peter M C Molenaar; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Interpreting the need for initial support to perform tandem stance tests of balance.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Hile; Jennifer S Brach; Subashan Perera; David M Wert; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Stephanie A Studenski
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2012-06-28

6.  Body sway adaptation to addition but not withdrawal of stabilizing visual information is delayed by a concurrent cognitive task.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Honeine; Oscar Crisafulli; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Asymmetry of foot position and weight distribution channels the inter-leg coordination dynamics of standing.

Authors:  Zheng Wang; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Analysis of relative kinematic index with normalized standing time between subjects with and without recurrent low back pain.

Authors:  Paul S Sung; Pamela Danial
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  A quick and qualitative assessment of gross motor development in preschool children.

Authors:  Tanja H Kakebeeke; Aziz Chaouch; Elisa Knaier; Jon Caflisch; Valentin Rousson; Remo H Largo; Oskar G Jenni
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 3.183

10.  Maximum Inter-foot Distance During Leg-crossing Movement Depends on Whether the Dominant or Non-dominant Leg Is in Front.

Authors:  Kazuya Usami; Keita Aimoto; Miwa Oyabu; Kakeru Hashimoto; Shunpei Owaki; Nozomi Tozawa; Izumi Kondo
Journal:  Prog Rehabil Med       Date:  2017-07-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.