Literature DB >> 15621243

The healing of confined critical size cancellous defects in the presence of silk fibroin hydrogel.

M Fini1, A Motta, P Torricelli, G Giavaresi, N Nicoli Aldini, M Tschon, R Giardino, C Migliaresi.   

Abstract

In vitro and in vivo behaviour of an injectable silk fibroin (SF) hydrogel was studied through osteoblast cultures and after implantation in critical-size defects of rabbit distal femurs. A commercial synthetic poly(D,L lactide-glycolide) copolymer was used as control material. In vitro biocompatibility was evaluated by measuring LDH release, cell proliferation (WST1), differentiation (ALP, OC), and synthetic activity (collagen I, TGF ss1, IL-6). Bone defect healing rate and quality of the newly formed bone inside the defects were determined in vivo by measuring trabecular bone volume (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), trabecular number (Tb.N), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp), mineral apposition rate (MAR) and bone formation rate (BFR/B.Pm). In vitro tests indicated that both materials significantly increased cell proliferation in comparison with the negative control. A significant increase in the TGF-beta1 level was found for SF hydrogel in comparison with the control material and negative control. Both materials promoted bone healing when used to fill critical size defects in rabbit femurs. The new-formed bone of the SF hydrogel treated defects showed significantly higher BV/TV, Tb.Th, MAR and BFR/B.Pm and lower Tb.Sp values in comparison with the control gel. At 12 weeks the re-grown bone of the SF hydrogel-treated defects appeared more similar to normal bone than that of the control synthetic polymeric material-treated defects, except for the Tb.N value that differed significantly from that of normal bone (p<0.05). MAR and BFR/B.Pm presented significantly (p<0.05) higher values for SF hydrogel-treated defects in comparison with controls treated with a synthetic polymeric material, confirming that SF hydrogel accelerated remodelling processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15621243     DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomaterials        ISSN: 0142-9612            Impact factor:   12.479


  44 in total

1.  Sonication-induced gelation of silk fibroin for cell encapsulation.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Wang; Jonathan A Kluge; Gary G Leisk; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Preclinical assessment of resorbable silk splints for the treatment of pediatric tracheomalacia.

Authors:  Meghan McGill; Nikhila Raol; Kevin S Gipson; Sarah N Bowe; Jackson Fulk-Logan; Anahita Nourmahnad; Joon Yong Chung; Michael J Whalen; David L Kaplan; Christopher J Hartnick
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Silk as a Biomaterial.

Authors:  Charu Vepari; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 29.190

4.  Vortex-induced injectable silk fibroin hydrogels.

Authors:  Tuna Yucel; Peggy Cebe; David L Kaplan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 5.  Protein based therapeutic delivery agents: Contemporary developments and challenges.

Authors:  Liming Yin; Carlo Yuvienco; Jin Kim Montclare
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Influence of organic solvents on the structural and thermal characteristics of silk protein from the web of Orthaga exvinacea Hampson (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae).

Authors:  Sajitha Narayanan; Mankadath Gokuldas
Journal:  J Chem Biol       Date:  2016-08-22

7.  Bone regeneration potential of a soybean-based filler: experimental study in a rabbit cancellous bone defects.

Authors:  Gianluca Giavaresi; Milena Fini; Jonathan Salvage; Nicolò Nicoli Aldini; Roberto Giardino; Luigi Ambrosio; Luigi Nicolais; Matteo Santin
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  The optimization of a scaffold for cartilage regeneration.

Authors:  Cristina Foss; Claudio Migliaresi; Antonella Motta
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2013-01-01       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  Mulberry non-engineered silk gland protein vis-à-vis silk cocoon protein engineered by silkworms as biomaterial matrices.

Authors:  Joydip Kundu; Moumita Dewan; Sarani Ghoshal; S C Kundu
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 10.  Biodegradation of silk biomaterials.

Authors:  Yang Cao; Bochu Wang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 6.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.