Literature DB >> 15621081

Update on liver transplantation using cyclosporine.

H Schrem1, R Lück, T Becker, B Nashan, J Klempnauer.   

Abstract

After the introduction of cyclosporine into liver transplantation in 1983, 1-year patient survival more than doubled. Later, with the improved microemulsified formulation of cyclosporine (Neoral) more stable pharmacokinetics were achieved. Today, C(2) monitoring of cyclosporine blood levels allows a more accurate estimation of the area under the concentration-versus-time curve as the single best indicator of cyclosporine exposure. As a consequence, with better control of side effects as well as desired effects the results of cyclosporine in liver transplantation have been further improved. The introduction of mycophenolate mofetil and basiliximab/daclizumab combination therapy has provided new options for the prevention of allograft rejection. The safety profile of individual immunosuppressive regimens comes more into focus since acute allograft rejection may be controlled successfully with competing strategies. As the focus in liver transplantation is shifting toward greatly improved long-term results, late posttransplant mortality with a functioning graft is a major concern. Prevention of long-term complications associated with highly effective immunosuppressants--posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease, cytomegalovirus infection, diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia-gains importance. Technical advances in living-related and cadaveric split-liver transplantation have lead to increasing use of segmental liver transplantation with the need to consider the effects of immunosuppression on liver regeneration and metabolism. The individualized orchestration of immunosuppression taking into account the underlying liver disease as well as other individual predispositions remains a future challenge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15621081     DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplant Proc        ISSN: 0041-1345            Impact factor:   1.066


  4 in total

Review 1.  Aftercare for patients with transplanted organs.

Authors:  Harald Schrem; Hannelore Barg-Hock; Christian P Strassburg; Anke Schwarz; Jürgen Klempnauer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Safety and feasibility of third-party multipotent adult progenitor cells for immunomodulation therapy after liver transplantation--a phase I study (MISOT-I).

Authors:  Felix C Popp; Barbara Fillenberg; Elke Eggenhofer; Philipp Renner; Johannes Dillmann; Volker Benseler; Andreas A Schnitzbauer; James Hutchinson; Robert Deans; Deborah Ladenheim; Cheryl A Graveen; Florian Zeman; Michael Koller; Martin J Hoogduijn; Edward K Geissler; Hans J Schlitt; Marc H Dahlke
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 5.531

Review 3.  [Long-term results after liver transplantation].

Authors:  H Schrem; N Till; T Becker; H Bektas; M P Manns; C P Strassburg; J Klempnauer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Matched-pair analysis: identification of factors with independent influence on the development of PTLD after kidney or liver transplantation.

Authors:  Lisa Rausch; Christian Koenecke; Hans-Friedrich Koch; Alexander Kaltenborn; Nikos Emmanouilidis; Lars Pape; Frank Lehner; Viktor Arelin; Ulrich Baumann; Harald Schrem
Journal:  Transplant Res       Date:  2016-08-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.