Literature DB >> 15619957

Chemical mutagenesis of the mouse genome: an overview.

Jean-Louis Guénet1.   

Abstract

The careful comparison of the phenotypic variations generated by different alleles at a given locus, including of course, those alleles with a deleterious effect, is often an important source of information for the understanding of gene functions. In fact, every time it is possible to match a specific alteration observed at the genomic level with a particular pathology, it is possible to establish a relationship between a gene and its function. When considered from this point of view, the production of new mutations by experimental mutagenesis appears as an alternative to the strategy of in vitro gene invalidation by homologous recombination in embryonic stem (ES) cells, with the advantage that experimental mutagenesis does not require any previous knowledge of the gene structure at the molecular level. Homologous recombination in ES cells is a 'gene driven' approach, in which mutant alleles are produced for those genes that we already know. Experimental mutagenesis, on the contrary, is a 'phenotype driven' approach, in which unknown genes are identified based on phenotypic changes. Also, while homologous recombination in ES cells requires a rather sophisticated technology, mutagenesis is simple to achieve but relies greatly on the efficiency of the mutagenic treatment as well as on the use of an accurate protocol for phenotyping. In this review, we will address a few comments about the different techniques that can be used for the induction of point mutations in the mouse germ line with special emphasis on chemical mutagenesis. We will also discuss the limitations of experimental mutagenesis and the necessity to look for alternative ways for the discovery of new genes and gene functions in the mouse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15619957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetica        ISSN: 0016-6707            Impact factor:   1.082


  10 in total

Review 1.  New routes for transgenesis of the mouse.

Authors:  José E Belizário; Priscilla Akamini; Philip Wolf; Bryan Strauss; José Xavier-Neto
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  ENU mutagenesis in mice identifies candidate genes for hypogonadism.

Authors:  Jeffrey Weiss; Lisa A Hurley; Rebecca M Harris; Courtney Finlayson; Minghan Tong; Lisa A Fisher; Jennifer L Moran; David R Beier; Christopher Mason; J Larry Jameson
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 2.957

3.  Neurobehavioral mutants identified in an ENU-mutagenesis project.

Authors:  Melloni N Cook; Jonathan P Dunning; Ronald G Wiley; Elissa J Chesler; Dabney K Johnson; Darla R Miller; Dan Goldowitz
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2007-07-15       Impact factor: 2.957

4.  Ion Torrent sequencing for conducting genome-wide scans for mutation mapping analysis.

Authors:  Rama Rao Damerla; Bishwanath Chatterjee; You Li; Richard J B Francis; Sarosh N Fatakia; Cecilia W Lo
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 5.  TILLING: a shortcut in functional genomics.

Authors:  Marzena Kurowska; Agata Daszkowska-Golec; Damian Gruszka; Marek Marzec; Miriam Szurman; Iwona Szarejko; Miroslaw Maluszynski
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Massively parallel sequencing of the mouse exome to accurately identify rare, induced mutations: an immediate source for thousands of new mouse models.

Authors:  T D Andrews; B Whittle; M A Field; B Balakishnan; Y Zhang; Y Shao; V Cho; M Kirk; M Singh; Y Xia; J Hager; S Winslade; G Sjollema; B Beutler; A Enders; C C Goodnow
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 6.411

7.  The most common technologies and tools for functional genome analysis.

Authors:  Evelina Gasperskaja; Vaidutis Kučinskas
Journal:  Acta Med Litu       Date:  2017

Review 8.  Random Mutagenesis as a Promising Tool for Microalgal Strain Improvement towards Industrial Production.

Authors:  Mafalda Trovão; Lisa M Schüler; Adriana Machado; Gabriel Bombo; Sofia Navalho; Ana Barros; Hugo Pereira; Joana Silva; Filomena Freitas; João Varela
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 6.085

9.  Promoting validation and cross-phylogenetic integration in model organism research.

Authors:  Keith C Cheng; Rebecca D Burdine; Mary E Dickinson; Stephen C Ekker; Alex Y Lin; K C Kent Lloyd; Cathleen M Lutz; Calum A MacRae; John H Morrison; David H O'Connor; John H Postlethwait; Crystal D Rogers; Susan Sanchez; Julie H Simpson; William S Talbot; Douglas C Wallace; Jill M Weimer; Hugo J Bellen
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 5.732

10.  Discovery of chemically induced mutations in rice by TILLING.

Authors:  Bradley J Till; Jennifer Cooper; Thomas H Tai; Peter Colowit; Elizabeth A Greene; Steven Henikoff; Luca Comai
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 4.215

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.