Literature DB >> 15619497

Surgeon reimbursement for trauma care.

Mary F Lumpkin1, Daniel G Judkins, John M Porter, Mark D Williams.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trauma care is a well-known financial burden for hospitals, yet reimbursement for the surgeon has not been reported.
METHODS: For 1999, the percent of the surgeons' bills reimbursed for general surgery services (gPR) was compared with that for trauma services (tPR). Mean tPR for various groups were compared. Factors predictive of tPR lower than gPR were identified.
RESULTS: The gPR was 49%, and, for 371 trauma patients, tPR was 45% (P = 0.03). The mean tPR for injury severity score (ISS) < or =10 was 48%, and for ISS > or =11, 57% (P = 0.03). Patients transferred from outside facilities did not have a significantly lower mean tPR. Penetrating trauma (odds ratio 3.7, P = 0.008) was predictive of tPR lower than gPR.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon reimbursements for trauma care was significantly, yet only slightly less than for all general surgery care. Surgeons should not be reluctant to take trauma call based on perceptions of low reimbursement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15619497     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2004.08.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  1 in total

1.  Has the trauma surgeon become house staff for the surgical subspecialist?

Authors:  David J Ciesla; Ernest E Moore; C Clay Cothren; Jeffery L Johnson; Jon M Burch
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.565

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.