Literature DB >> 15619309

Preoperative sonographic features of borderline ovarian tumors.

C Exacoustos1, M E Romanini, D Rinaldo, C Amoroso, B Szabolcs, E Zupi, D Arduini.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the sonographic findings that distinguish borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) from both benign and invasive malignant tumors, thus allowing conservative treatment and laparoscopic management of these tumors.
METHODS: We reviewed retrospectively transvaginal sonograms of 33 women who, when evaluated further by surgery and histology, were found to have BOT. Twenty-three were premenopausal and 10 were postmenopausal (mean age +/- SD, 45.8 +/- 15.7 years). For each mass, size and morphological features and power Doppler characteristics were evaluated. We compared these findings with those of 337 patients with benign ovarian tumors and those of 82 patients with invasive malignant ovarian tumors. Patients with dermoid cysts were not included in the study.
RESULTS: Of the 33 BOT, 15 were mucinous and 18 were serous cystadenomas. The presence of papillae, defined as a small number of solid tissue projections, 1-15 mm in height and 1-10 mm in width (base) and length (base), into the cyst cavity from the cyst wall, was significantly more frequent in BOT (48%) than it was in benign (4%) and invasive (4%) malignant tumors. Intracystic solid tissue (> 15 mm in height or > 10 mm in width or length) was observed in 48% of invasive malignant masses but in only 18% of BOT and in 7% of benign tumors (P < 0.001). No sonographically unilocular, hypoechoic, smooth-walled adnexal cysts were invasively malignant but three unilocular cysts with a diameter of > 6 cm were serous BOT. Although close attention was paid to the cyst wall at ultrasound examination we did not observe in these three cysts the very small papillae which were found at histological analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: The most frequent diagnostic feature on imaging BOT is the presence of papillae within the cyst. However, neither papillae nor other sonographic features constituted highly sensitive sonographic markers of BOT. Copyright (c) 2004 ISUOG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15619309     DOI: 10.1002/uog.1823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  10 in total

1.  Screening for ovarian cancer: imaging challenges and opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  K B Mathieu; D G Bedi; S L Thrower; A Qayyum; R C Bast
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 2.  Diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of borderline ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Daniela Fischerova; Michal Zikan; Pavel Dundr; David Cibula
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-09-28

3.  Multimodality imaging of ovarian cystic lesions: Review with an imaging based algorithmic approach.

Authors:  Ashish P Wasnik; Christine O Menias; Joel F Platt; Usha R Lalchandani; Deepak G Bedi; Khaled M Elsayes
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2013-03-28

4.  Evaluation of selected ultrasonographic parameters and marker levels in the preoperative differentiation of borderline ovarian tumors and ovarian cancers.

Authors:  Piotr Sobiczewski; Anna Dańska-Bidzińska; Jakub Rzepka; Jolanta Kupryjańczyk; Mariusz Gujski; Mariusz Bidziński; Wojciech Michalski
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2012-07-21       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 5.  Borderline tumours of the ovary, current controversies regarding their diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  María Guadalupe Patrono; Lucas Minig; Ivan Diaz-Padilla; Nuria Romero; Juan Francisco Rodriguez Moreno; Jesus Garcia-Donas
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2013-12-17

Review 6.  Fertility sparing treatment in borderline ovarian tumours.

Authors:  Rosa Maria Alvarez; Daniel Vazquez-Vicente
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2015-02-03

Review 7.  The characteristic ultrasound features of specific types of ovarian pathology (review).

Authors:  Ahmad Sayasneh; Christine Ekechi; Laura Ferrara; Jeroen Kaijser; Catriona Stalder; Shyamaly Sur; Dirk Timmerman; Tom Bourne
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 5.650

Review 8.  Serous borderline ovarian tumours: an extensive review on MR imaging features.

Authors:  Hilal Sahin; Asli Irmak Akdogan; Janette Smith; Jeries Paolo Zawaideh; Helen Addley
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.629

9.  Mucinous Borderline Ovarian Tumor in Very Old Aged Postmenopausal Woman.

Authors:  Seung-Hee Lee; Tae-Hee Kim; Hae-Hyeog Lee; Arum Lee; Yeon-Suk Kim; Dong-Su Jeon; Jeong Ja Kwak; Yo-Sep Yang
Journal:  J Menopausal Med       Date:  2015-12-25

10.  KNDC1 Is a Predictive Marker of Malignant Transformation in Borderline Ovarian Tumors.

Authors:  Shuqian Yu; Jiayu Shen; Jing Fei; Xiaoqing Zhu; Meichen Yin; Jianwei Zhou
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.147

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.