Literature DB >> 15619123

A decrease in blood pressure following pyelolithotomy but not extracorporeal lithotripsy.

Davor Eterović1, Marijan Situm, Ljubica Juretić-Kuscić, Zeljko Dujić.   

Abstract

Our aim was to evaluate the hypothesis that relief of renal obstruction lowers the arterial blood pressure if the procedure of stone removal does not injure the kidney itself. Sixty patients with unilateral renal stone were evaluated at baseline and 3 months after electrical shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL, n=30) or Gil-Vernet intrasinus pyelolithotomy (n=30). Blood pressures were measured noninvasively and renal vascular resistances were obtained from radionuclide measurements of renal blood flow. At baseline, the renal vascular resistance of the obstructed kidney was 2 and 2.5 times greater than of the unobstructed kidney in the ESWL and pyelolithotomy groups, respectively. After 3 months in operated patients, the blood pressure decreased (from 87 to 81 mm Hg, P=0.002, in case of diastolic, and from 140 to 132 mm Hg, P<0.0001, in case of systolic pressure), while the vascular resistances of both kidneys were equal and normal. In contrast, in the ESWL group the blood pressures and vascular resistances of the treated kidney did not differ from the baseline values. Surgical relief of renal obstruction chronically lowers the arterial blood pressure, possibly by normalizing the renal vascular resistance. ESWL does not change the blood pressure or renal vascular resistance, which could reflect a balance between the relief of obstruction and kidney lesions induced by shock waves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15619123     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-004-0452-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  13 in total

1.  Pyelolithotomy improves while extracorporeal lithotripsy impairs kidney function.

Authors:  D Eterović; L Juretić-Kuscić; V Capkun; Z Dujić
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Role of the renal medulla in volume and arterial pressure regulation.

Authors:  A W Cowley
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1997-07

3.  Blood pressure changes following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and other forms of treatment for nephrolithiasis.

Authors:  J E Lingeman; J R Woods; P D Toth
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-04-04       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Unrecognised high pressure chronic retention of urine presenting with systemic arterial hypertension.

Authors:  R R Ghose; V Harindra
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-06-17

5.  Radionuclide evaluation pre- and postextracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi.

Authors:  J Bomanji; S A Boddy; K E Britton; C C Nimmon; H N Whitfield
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Essential arterial hypertension and stone disease.

Authors:  L Borghi; T Meschi; A Guerra; A Briganti; T Schianchi; F Allegri; A Novarini
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Arterial blood pressure following different types of urinary stone therapy. Presented at the 8th European Symposium on Urolithiasis, Parma, Italy, 1999.

Authors:  W L Strohmaier; J Schmidt; S Lahme; K H Bichler
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Nephrolithiasis and risk of hypertension.

Authors:  F Madore; M J Stampfer; E B Rimm; G C Curhan
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.689

9.  Reversible hypertension associated with unrecognised high pressure chronic retention of urine.

Authors:  D A Jones; N J George; P H O'Reilly; R J Barnard
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-05-09       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  The effect of newer generation lithotripsy upon renal function assessed by nuclear scintigraphy.

Authors:  M Gupta; D M Bolton; P Irby; W Hubner; J S Wolf; R S Hattner; M L Stoller
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  2 in total

1.  Wrong perspective obscures the adverse effects of shock-wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Davor Eterović; Marijan Situm; Vinko Marković; Ante Punda
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2012-12-23       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Urinary obstruction depresses erythropoiesis which recovers after parenchyma-saving surgery but not SWL.

Authors:  Davor Eterović; Marijan Situm; Ante Punda; Vinko Marković; Slaven Kokić
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2009-12-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.