Literature DB >> 15618787

No evidence of memory function during anesthesia with propofol or isoflurane with close control of hypnotic state.

Chantal Kerssens1, Takashi Ouchi, Peter S Sebel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors previously demonstrated memory function during apparently adequate general anesthesia in trauma patients. Hypnotic state fluctuations, stress, and variable amnesic qualities of commonly used anesthetics could account for this effect.
METHODS: The authors replicated the trauma investigation in 90 elective surgical patients to enable anesthetic titration to a bispectral index value of 50-55 during auditory presentation of word stimuli. Patients were randomly assigned to maintenance with propofol (n = 48) or isoflurane (n = 42). Before surgery, state anxiety and trait anxiety were assessed using self-report measures. Postoperative memory assessment relied on the process dissociation procedure using a word stem completion task.
RESULTS: There were no differences between groups for relevant demographic, preoperative, or supplemental drug variables. Ninety-eight percent of words were presented within a bispectral index range of 40-60, with values averaging 48.8 (SD = 5.7) during word presentation. Neither the process dissociation procedure nor standard measures of conscious recall and recognition memory showed evidence of explicit or implicit memory. Preoperative stress levels did not correlate with postoperative memory test scores in either study group.
CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the results of their previous study, the authors found no evidence of memory function with close control of hypnotic state. This suggests that hypnotic state fluctuations are important to memory activation under anesthesia. Other variables may contribute to preserved memory function as well. Propofol and isoflurane block memory equally well during adequate anesthesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15618787     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200501000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  7 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of anesthetic actions and the brain.

Authors:  Yumiko Ishizawa
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Awareness during anesthesia: how sure can we be that the patient is sleeping indeed?

Authors:  G Kotsovolis; G Komninos
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 0.471

3.  Does memory priming during anesthesia matter?

Authors:  Jackie Andrade
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Propofol anesthesia does not alter regional rates of cerebral protein synthesis measured with L-[1-(11)C]leucine and PET in healthy male subjects.

Authors:  Shrinivas Bishu; Kathleen C Schmidt; Thomas V Burlin; Michael A Channing; Lisa Horowitz; Tianjiang Huang; Zhong-hua Liu; Mei Qin; B-K Vuong; Aaron J Unterman; Zengyan Xia; Alan Zametkin; Peter Herscovitch; Zenaide Quezado; Carolyn B Smith
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 5.  Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery.

Authors:  Anthony G Messina; Michael Wang; Marshall J Ward; Chase C Wilker; Brett B Smith; Daniel P Vezina; Nathan Leon Pace
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-18

Review 6.  Efficacy of therapeutic suggestions under general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Jenny Rosendahl; Susan Koranyi; Davina Jacob; Nina Zech; Ernil Hansen
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 2.217

7.  Comparative effects of sevoflurane and propofol based general anaesthesia for elective surgery on memory.

Authors:  Lito Flouda; Ageliki Pandazi; Charalampos Papageorgiou; Despoina Perrea; Eleni Krepi; Georgia Kostopanagiotou
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 3.318

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.