Literature DB >> 1561800

Elective lymph node dissection for melanoma: two perspectives.

W H McCarthy1, H M Shaw, N Cascinelli, M Santinami, F Belli.   

Abstract

Node dissection for melanoma remains the most important therapeutic decision for the optimal management of the patient with melanoma. In Australia and in some parts of the United States, the majority of patients with intermediate thickness melanoma (1.6-4.00 mm) will undergo elective lymph node dissection. In Europe, the majority of patients with similar lesions are treated with wide local excision only. The development of an agreed policy for node dissection for melanoma awaits the results of 2 current, prospective randomized trials confirming or disproving the efficacy of elective lymph node dissection. Non-randomized studies showing a benefit or not showing a benefit are readily available but the only 2 prospective randomized studies published to date showing a benefit, have been criticized on methodologic grounds. This paper summarizes the evidence and opinions on both sides of this debate. The clinician charged with responsibility for this important decision must, as yet, make the decision to dissect lymph nodes on the basis of a perspective derived from the best available evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1561800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  34 in total

1.  The role of regional node dissection in the treatment of malignant melanoma.

Authors:  H W SOUTHWICK; D P SLAUGHTER; J F HINKAMP; F E JOHNSON
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1962-07

2.  Treatment of 126 cases of malignant melanoma: long term results.

Authors:  S L GUMPORT; H W MEYER
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1959-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Adjuvant immunotherapy with BCG in treatment of regional-lymph-node metastases from malignant melanoma.

Authors:  F R Eilber; D L Morton; E C Holmes; F C Sparks; K P Ramming
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-01-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Axillary lymph node dissection: differences in goals and techniques when treating melanoma and breast cancer.

Authors:  C M Balch
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Lymphadenectomy in the management of stage I malignant melanoma: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  F H Sim; W F Taylor; D J Pritchard; E H Soule
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Tumor thickness as a guide to surgical management of clinical stage I melanoma patients.

Authors:  C M Balch; T M Murad; S J Soong; A L Ingalls; P C Richards; W A Maddox
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Axillary node dissection in malignant melanoma: results and complications.

Authors:  C P Karakousis; M A Hena; L J Emrich; D L Driscoll
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 8.  Immunosuppression by melanoma cells as a factor in the generation of metastatic disease.

Authors:  A J Cochran; D R Wen; Z Farzad; M A Stene; W McBride; A M Lana; D S Hoon; D L Morton
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1989 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.480

9.  Adjuvant treatment with polyadenylic-polyuridylic acid (Polya.Polyu) in operable breast cancer.

Authors:  J Lacour; F Lacour; A Spira; M Michelson; J Y Petit; G Delage; D Sarrazin; G Contesso; J Viguier
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-07-26       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Malignant melanoma patients with positive nodes and relatively good prognoses: microstaging retains prognostic significance in clinical stage I melanoma patients with metastases to regional nodes.

Authors:  C L Day; A J Sober; R A Lew; M C Mihm; T B Fitzpatrick; A W Kopf; M N Harris; S L Gumport; J W Raker; R A Malt; F M Golomb; A B Cosimi; W C Wood; P Casson; S Lopransi; F Gorstein; A Postel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  1 in total

1.  PEGylation of interferon α2 improves lymphatic exposure after subcutaneous and intravenous administration and improves antitumour efficacy against lymphatic breast cancer metastases.

Authors:  Lisa M Kaminskas; David B Ascher; Victoria M McLeod; Marco J Herold; Caroline P Le; Erica K Sloan; Christopher J H Porter
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 9.776

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.