Literature DB >> 15617516

Kinetic isotope effects and ligand binding in PQQ-dependent methanol dehydrogenase.

Parvinder Hothi1, Michael J Sutcliffe, Nigel S Scrutton.   

Abstract

The reaction of PQQ (2,7,9-tricarboxypyrroloquinoline quinone)-dependent MDH (methanol dehydrogenase) from Methylophilus methylotrophus has been studied under steady-state conditions in the presence of an alternative activator [GEE (glycine ethyl ester)] and compared with similar reactions performed with ammonium (used more generally as an activator in steady-state analysis of MDH). Studies of initial velocity with methanol (protiated methanol, C1H3O1H) and [2H]methanol (deuteriated methanol, C2H3O2H) as substrate, performed with different concentrations of GEE and PES (phenazine ethosulphate), indicate competitive binding effects for substrate and PES on the stimulation and inhibition of enzyme activity by GEE. GEE is more effective at stimulating activity than ammonium at low concentrations, suggesting tighter binding of GEE to the active site. Inhibition of activity at high GEE concentration is less pronounced than at high ammonium concentration. This suggests a close spatial relationship between the stimulatory (KS) and inhibitory (KI) binding sites in that binding of GEE to the KS site sterically impairs the binding of GEE to the KI site. The binding of GEE is also competitive with the binding of PES, and GEE is more effective than ammonium in competing with PES. This competitive binding of GEE and PES lowers the effective concentration of PES at the site competent for electron transfer. Accordingly, the oxidative half-reaction, which is second-order with respect to PES concentration, is more rate-limiting in steady-state turnover with GEE than with ammonium. The smaller methanol C-1H/C-2H kinetic isotope effects observed with GEE are consistent with a larger contribution made by the oxidative half-reaction to rate limitation. Cyanide is much less effective at suppressing 'endogenous' activity in the presence of GEE than with ammonium, which is attributed to impaired binding of cyanide to the catalytic site through steric interaction with GEE bound at the KS site. The kinetic model developed previously for reactions of MDH with ammonium [Hothi, Basran, Sutcliffe and Scrutton (2003) Biochemistry 42, 3966-3978] is consistent with data obtained with GEE, although a more detailed structural interpretation is given here. Molecular-modelling studies rationalize the kinetic observations in terms of a complex binding scenario at the molecular level involving two spatially distinct inhibitory sites (KI and KI'). The KI' site caps the entrance to the active site and is interpreted as the PES binding site. The KI site is adjacent to, and, for GEE, overlaps with, the KS site, and is located in the active-site cavity close to the PQQ cofactor and the catalytic site for methanol oxidation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15617516      PMCID: PMC1186700          DOI: 10.1042/BJ20041731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem J        ISSN: 0264-6021            Impact factor:   3.857


  28 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Natural engineering principles of electron tunnelling in biological oxidation-reduction.

Authors:  C C Page; C C Moser; X Chen; P L Dutton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-11-04       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Methanol dehydrogenase, a PQQ-containing quinoprotein dehydrogenase.

Authors:  C Anthony
Journal:  Subcell Biochem       Date:  2000

4.  Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD.

Authors:  Marcel L Verdonk; Jason C Cole; Michael J Hartshorn; Christopher W Murray; Richard D Taylor
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-09-01

5.  Simplified normal mode analysis of conformational transitions in DNA-dependent polymerases: the elastic network model.

Authors:  M Delarue; Y-H Sanejouand
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Site-directed mutagenesis and X-ray crystallography of the PQQ-containing quinoprotein methanol dehydrogenase and its electron acceptor, cytochrome c(L).

Authors:  P R Afolabi; F Mohammed; K Amaratunga; O Majekodunmi; S L Dales; R Gill; D Thompson; J B Cooper; S P Wood; P M Goodwin; C Anthony
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-08-21       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Effects of multiple ligand binding on kinetic isotope effects in PQQ-dependent methanol dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Parvinder Hothi; Jaswir Basran; Michael J Sutcliffe; Nigel S Scrutton
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2003-04-08       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  In silico studies of the mechanism of methanol oxidation by quinoprotein methanol dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Swarnalatha Y Reddy; Thomas C Bruice
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2003-07-09       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 9.  The quinoprotein dehydrogenases for methanol and glucose.

Authors:  Christopher Anthony
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 4.013

10.  Catalytic mechanism of quinoprotein methanol dehydrogenase: A theoretical and x-ray crystallographic investigation.

Authors:  Y J Zheng; F S Mathews; T C Bruice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  2 in total

1.  Impact of the lanthanide contraction on the activity of a lanthanide-dependent methanol dehydrogenase - a kinetic and DFT study.

Authors:  Henning Lumpe; Arjan Pol; Huub J M Op den Camp; Lena J Daumann
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 4.390

2.  Understanding the chemistry of the artificial electron acceptors PES, PMS, DCPIP and Wurster's Blue in methanol dehydrogenase assays.

Authors:  Bérénice Jahn; Niko S W Jonasson; Hurina Hu; Helena Singer; Arjan Pol; Nathan M Good; Huub J M Op den Camp; N Cecilia Martinez-Gomez; Lena J Daumann
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.358

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.