Literature DB >> 15617458

A double-blind comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of telmisartan 40-80 mg vs. losartan 50-100 mg in Taiwanese hypertensive patients.

Y T Lee1, C M Lee, C S Lin, S H Sheu, W K Kuo, C W Tsai, L C Huang, H C Huang, J S Wang, W K Tseng.   

Abstract

A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, dose-titration study was conducted to determine the efficacy and tolerability of telmisartan 40-80 mg once daily compared with losartan 50-100 mg once daily in 180 Taiwanese patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. After an initial 2-week placebo run-in phase, patients were randomised in a double-blind, double-dummy fashion to receive either telmisartan 40 mg or losartan 50 mg. If blood pressure control (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] <90 mmHg or > or = 10 mmHg reduction in DBP) was achieved after 4 weeks, the dose was maintained for the second 4 weeks of the active treatment phase; if not, the dose was doubled to telmisartan 80 mg or losartan 100 mg, respectively, for the second 4 weeks of double-blind treatment. Telmisartan 40-80 mg (n = 86) was as effective as losartan 50-100 mg (n = 90) in reducing trough seated DBP (11.1 vs. 8.7 mmHg, p = 0.144), and was significantly more effective than losartan in reducing trough seated systolic blood pressure (SBP) (22.1 vs. 16.5 mmHg, p = 0.032) and standing SBP (21.0 vs. 16.3 mmHg, p = 0.033). Significantly fewer patients treated with telmisartan than those treated with losartan required uptitration after 4 weeks' treatment (32.6% vs. 61.5%, p = 0.001). Both telmisartan and losartan were well tolerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15617458     DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2004.00409.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pract Suppl        ISSN: 1368-504X


  4 in total

1.  Effects of oral fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan plus ramipril and losartan plus ramipril in hypertension: A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase iii trial in adult indian patients.

Authors:  S D Jain; Sangram Biradar; I Periyandavar; Sanjeet Singh Sodhi; K Anwaruddin; Ashish Gawde; Vidyagauri Baliga; Kailas Gandewar; Anish Desai
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2005-11

Review 2.  The comparative efficacy and safety of the angiotensin receptor blockers in the management of hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Hazel Mae A Abraham; C Michael White; William B White
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Comparison of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of essential hypertension.

Authors:  David H G Smith
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Is the newest angiotensin-receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil more efficacious in lowering blood pressure than the older ones? A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ji-Guang Wang; Miao Zhang; Ying-Qing Feng; Chang-Sheng Ma; Tzung-Dau Wang; Zhi-Ming Zhu; Kazuomi Kario
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 3.738

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.