Literature DB >> 1561680

Computed tomography in prognostic stroke evaluation.

D Rasmussen1, O Køhler, S Worm-Petersen, N Blegvad, H L Jacobsen, I Bergmann, M Egeblad, M Friis, N T Nielsen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Computed tomography is now routinely used in many hospitals to investigate cerebrovascular disease. The purpose of our prospective study was to determine whether cranial computed tomography in connection with neurological assessment was useful in prognostic evaluation of survival after acute stroke.
METHODS: Two-hundred forty-five consecutive stroke patients were included in the project during a 1-year period. Each had a detailed neurological assessment 24-72 hours after stroke onset and underwent cranial computed tomography without intravenous contrast injection within the first week after admission. The lesions were divided according to neuroanatomic regions. In the statistical analyses we used a multiple logistic regression model with survival/death as the binary variable.
RESULTS: Computed tomography showed 76% of the patients had infarcts, 11% had hemorrhages, and 13% had no acute lesion. Forty-three patients had more than one acute lesion, and 57 had one or more old infarctions. The temporal, parietal, and frontal regions and the basal ganglia were most often affected.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that age, level of consciousness, and involvement of the temporal lobe on computed tomography were factors of prognostic significance regarding survival in the acute phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1561680     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.23.4.506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cost-effective intervention in stroke.

Authors:  D Dunbabin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Visible infarction on computed tomography is an independent predictor of poor functional outcome after stroke, and not of haemorrhagic transformation.

Authors:  J M Wardlaw; T M West; P A G Sandercock; S C Lewis; O Mielke
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Frontal and frontoparietal injury differentially affect the ipsilateral corticospinal projection from the nonlesioned hemisphere in monkey (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  R J Morecraft; J Ge; K S Stilwell-Morecraft; D W McNeal; S M Hynes; M A Pizzimenti; D L Rotella; W G Darling
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  Sensorimotor cortex injury effects on recovery of contralesional dexterous movements in Macaca mulatta.

Authors:  Warren G Darling; Marc A Pizzimenti; Diane L Rotella; Stephanie M Hynes; Jizhi Ge; Kimberly Stilwell-Morecraft; Robert J Morecraft
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 5.  Middle cerebral artery occlusion model in rodents: methods and potential pitfalls.

Authors:  Fudong Liu; Louise D McCullough
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-01-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.