Literature DB >> 15616233

Validity and reliability of an instrument for assessing health-related quality of life and treatment preferences: the Insulin Delivery System Rating Questionnaire.

Mark Peyrot1, Richard R Rubin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide a preliminary assessment of the validity and reliability of a new measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and treatment preference for insulin delivery systems. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Study participants were 197 adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who completed the Insulin Delivery System Rating Questionnaire (IDSRQ), a self-administered questionnaire developed for this study. The IDSRQ assessed patient perceptions of treatment satisfaction, impact of treatment on daily activities, clinical efficacy, diabetes-related worries and social burdens, psychological well-being, and overall treatment system preference of patients using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and multiple daily injections (MDI).
RESULTS: The IDSRQ subscales had acceptable reliability (alpha = 0.67-0.92, median 0.82) and test-retest correlations (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.67-0.94, median 0.88). Floor effects (0-10%, median 0%) and ceiling effects (0-18%, median 4%) were minimal. There were statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) between patients using CSII and MDI on all IDSRQ subscales except psychological well-being (P = 0.096); differences in means were 0.3-1.4 SD units (median 0.9). Multiple regression analysis (controlling for age, sex, and type of diabetes) showed that treatment satisfaction, perceived clinical efficacy, and psychological well-being were independently associated with overall treatment preference and accounted for half of the difference in preference between CSII and MDI patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings suggest that the IDSRQ is a valid and reliable measure of HRQOL and treatment preferences for insulin delivery systems. The subscales are comprehensive, sensitive to differences in user populations, and account for most of the preference for a particular insulin delivery system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15616233     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.1.53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  29 in total

1.  Using Remote Communication Technology in Insulin Pump Training: A Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Linda Parks; Tae Youn Kim
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-09-29

2.  A 16-week open-label, multicenter pilot study assessing insulin pump therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes suboptimally controlled with multiple daily injections.

Authors:  Juan P Frias; Bruce W Bode; Timothy S Bailey; Mark S Kipnes; Rocco Brunelle; Steven V Edelman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-07-01

Review 3.  [Insulin pump therapy in children, adolescents and adults].

Authors:  Marietta Stadler; Sandra Zlamal-Fortunat; Ingrid Schütz-Fuhrmann; Birgit Rami-Merhar; Elke Fröhlich-Reiterer; Sabine Hofer; Julia Mader; Michael Resl; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Raimund Weitgasser; Rudolf Prager; Martin Bischof
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  Comparison of a novel insulin bolus-patch with pen/syringe injection to deliver mealtime insulin for efficacy, preference, and quality of life in adults with diabetes: a randomized, crossover, multicenter study.

Authors:  Nancy Bohannon; Richard Bergenstal; Robert Cuddihy; Davida Kruger; Susan List; Elaine Massaro; Mark Molitch; Philip Raskin; Heather Remtema; Suzanne Strowig; Fred Whitehouse; Rocco L Brunelle; Darlene Dreon; Meng Tan
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 6.118

5.  Can integrated technology improve self-care behavior in youth with type 1 diabetes? A randomized crossover trial of automated pump function.

Authors:  Orla M Neylon; Michele A O'Connell; Susan M Donath; Fergus J Cameron
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-17

6.  How does treatment satisfaction work?: Modeling determinants of treatment satisfaction and preference.

Authors:  Mark Peyrot; Richard R Rubin
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 17.152

7.  Psychometric properties of an instrument for assessing the experience of patients treated with inhaled insulin: the inhaled insulin treatment questionnaire (IITQ).

Authors:  Richard R Rubin; Mark Peyrot
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Assessing quality of life for new diabetes treatments and technologies: a simple patient-centered score.

Authors:  John C Pickup; Anna Harris
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-05

9.  Diabetes Medication Satisfaction Tool: a focus on treatment regimens.

Authors:  Roger T Anderson; Cynthia J Girman; Manjiri D Pawaskar; Fabian T Camacho; Jorge Calles; William S Kelly; Carla DeMuro; Rajesh Balkrishnan
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Correlates of insulin injection omission.

Authors:  Mark Peyrot; Richard R Rubin; Davida F Kruger; Luther B Travis
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.