Mark Peyrot1, Richard R Rubin. 1. Department of Sociology and Center for Social and Community Research, Loyola College, Baltimore, Maryland 21210-2699, USA. mpeyrot@loyola.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To provide a preliminary assessment of the validity and reliability of a new measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and treatment preference for insulin delivery systems. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Study participants were 197 adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who completed the Insulin Delivery System Rating Questionnaire (IDSRQ), a self-administered questionnaire developed for this study. The IDSRQ assessed patient perceptions of treatment satisfaction, impact of treatment on daily activities, clinical efficacy, diabetes-related worries and social burdens, psychological well-being, and overall treatment system preference of patients using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and multiple daily injections (MDI). RESULTS: The IDSRQ subscales had acceptable reliability (alpha = 0.67-0.92, median 0.82) and test-retest correlations (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.67-0.94, median 0.88). Floor effects (0-10%, median 0%) and ceiling effects (0-18%, median 4%) were minimal. There were statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) between patients using CSII and MDI on all IDSRQ subscales except psychological well-being (P = 0.096); differences in means were 0.3-1.4 SD units (median 0.9). Multiple regression analysis (controlling for age, sex, and type of diabetes) showed that treatment satisfaction, perceived clinical efficacy, and psychological well-being were independently associated with overall treatment preference and accounted for half of the difference in preference between CSII and MDI patients. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings suggest that the IDSRQ is a valid and reliable measure of HRQOL and treatment preferences for insulin delivery systems. The subscales are comprehensive, sensitive to differences in user populations, and account for most of the preference for a particular insulin delivery system.
OBJECTIVE: To provide a preliminary assessment of the validity and reliability of a new measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and treatment preference for insulin delivery systems. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Study participants were 197 adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes who completed the Insulin Delivery System Rating Questionnaire (IDSRQ), a self-administered questionnaire developed for this study. The IDSRQ assessed patient perceptions of treatment satisfaction, impact of treatment on daily activities, clinical efficacy, diabetes-related worries and social burdens, psychological well-being, and overall treatment system preference of patients using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and multiple daily injections (MDI). RESULTS: The IDSRQ subscales had acceptable reliability (alpha = 0.67-0.92, median 0.82) and test-retest correlations (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.67-0.94, median 0.88). Floor effects (0-10%, median 0%) and ceiling effects (0-18%, median 4%) were minimal. There were statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) between patients using CSII and MDI on all IDSRQ subscales except psychological well-being (P = 0.096); differences in means were 0.3-1.4 SD units (median 0.9). Multiple regression analysis (controlling for age, sex, and type of diabetes) showed that treatment satisfaction, perceived clinical efficacy, and psychological well-being were independently associated with overall treatment preference and accounted for half of the difference in preference between CSII and MDIpatients. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings suggest that the IDSRQ is a valid and reliable measure of HRQOL and treatment preferences for insulin delivery systems. The subscales are comprehensive, sensitive to differences in user populations, and account for most of the preference for a particular insulin delivery system.
Authors: Juan P Frias; Bruce W Bode; Timothy S Bailey; Mark S Kipnes; Rocco Brunelle; Steven V Edelman Journal: J Diabetes Sci Technol Date: 2011-07-01
Authors: Marietta Stadler; Sandra Zlamal-Fortunat; Ingrid Schütz-Fuhrmann; Birgit Rami-Merhar; Elke Fröhlich-Reiterer; Sabine Hofer; Julia Mader; Michael Resl; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Raimund Weitgasser; Rudolf Prager; Martin Bischof Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Nancy Bohannon; Richard Bergenstal; Robert Cuddihy; Davida Kruger; Susan List; Elaine Massaro; Mark Molitch; Philip Raskin; Heather Remtema; Suzanne Strowig; Fred Whitehouse; Rocco L Brunelle; Darlene Dreon; Meng Tan Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2011-07-06 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Roger T Anderson; Cynthia J Girman; Manjiri D Pawaskar; Fabian T Camacho; Jorge Calles; William S Kelly; Carla DeMuro; Rajesh Balkrishnan Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2008-10-17 Impact factor: 19.112