Literature DB >> 15615990

Contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 1.5 T after implantation of platinum stents: in vitro and in vivo comparison with conventional stent designs.

Klaus D Hagspiel1, D A Leung, Kiran R Nandalur, John F Angle, Harjot S Dulai, David J Spinosa, A H Matsumoto, J M Christopher, Hossam Ahmed, S S Berr.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate the in vitro and in vivo 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography characteristics of a new platinum-based balloon-expandable stent system and compare this system with a variety of competing metallic stents.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: All experiments were performed on 1.5-T scanners. In vitro experiments were performed using 10 stents implanted into a custom-built phantom. Different orientations of the stents along the magnetic field and multiple flip angles were examined. In addition, 19 patients underwent contrast-enhanced MR angiography after the implantation of 36 stents, including four patients with six platinum stents. Angiographic correlation was available for all 19 patients, and luminal patency and stent-induced artifacts were assessed quantitatively.
RESULTS: Of the tested balloon-expandable stents, only the platinum-based stents created artifact causing luminal narrowing of 30% or less. All other balloon-expandable stents induced larger artifacts that resulted in higher degrees of narrowing. Thus, if patent, the platinum-based stents allow significant in-stent stenosis to be ruled out reliably. Selected nitinol- or tantalum-based self-expandable stents also are suitable in this regard.
CONCLUSION: Of the tested devices, platinum-based stents are the only type of currently available balloon-expandable stent that creates 30% or less artifact-induced apparent stenosis and thus are suitable for MR angiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15615990     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.184.1.01840288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  6 in total

1.  Comparing different MR angiography strategies of carotid stents in a vascular flow model: toward stent-specific recommendations in MR follow-up.

Authors:  Andreas M J Frölich; Sara M Pilgram-Pastor; Marios N Psychogios; Alexander Mohr; Michael Knauth
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Cross-sectional vascular imaging with CT and MR angiography.

Authors:  Hasan K Kabul; Klaus D Hagspiel
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  The role of CT and MRI in the assessment of peripheral vascular disease.

Authors:  Franz von Ziegler; Marco A Costa
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Artificial luminal narrowing on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiograms on an occasion of stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysm: in vitro comparison using two different stents with variable imaging parameters.

Authors:  Jee Hyun Seok; Hyun Seok Choi; So-Lyung Jung; Kook-Jin Ahn; Myeong Jin Kim; Yong Sam Shin; Bum-soo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  The implications of magnetic resonance angiography artifacts caused by different types of intracranial flow diverters.

Authors:  Batur Halitcan; Sayin Bige; Balci Sinan; Akmangit Ilkay; Daglioglu Ergun; Alagoz Fatih; Arat Anil
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 5.364

6.  Pediatric cardiovascular interventional devices: effect on CMR images at 1.5 and 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Sarah N Khan; Stanislas Rapacchi; Daniel S Levi; J Paul Finn
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 5.364

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.