Literature DB >> 1561588

Cost-benefit analysis of selective screening criteria for Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women attending Colorado family planning clinics.

J T Humphreys1, J F Henneberry, R S Rickard, J L Beebe.   

Abstract

Women attending family planning clinics in Colorado during 1988 were screened for Chlamydia trachomatis infection by enzyme immunoassay (EIA, Chlamydiazyme, Abbott Laboratories; Abbott Park, IL). Cervical specimens from 11,793 women attending 22 family planning clinics were analyzed. Patient history and physical exams were used to assess risk factors for infection. A total of 913 individuals (7.7%) had positive culture results for C. trachomatis. Multivariate analysis showed that infection was significantly related to endocervical bleeding, cervical mucopurulent discharge, a new sexual partner in the last 3 months or multiple previous sexual partners (greater than 3) in the last year, pregnancy, the use of oral contraceptives, and age. Increased odd ratios were observed for the combination of endocervical bleeding and mucopurulent discharge and sexual history that included partners over the previous year as well as the most recent 3 months. A combination of these criteria was used to selectively screen women attending Colorado family planning clinics on an ongoing basis. A cost-benefit analysis employing a model reported previously showed a significant financial benefit associated with universal screening over either selective screening or no screening for C. trachomatis in this population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age Distribution; Age Factors; Americas; Barrier Methods; Behavior; Biology; Chlamydia; Colorado; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods; Contraceptive Usage; Cost Benefit Analysis; Data Analysis; Demographic Factors; Developed Countries; Diseases; Evaluation; Examinations And Diagnoses; Family Planning; Incidence; Infections; Laboratory Examinations And Diagnoses; Measurement; North America; Northern America; Population; Population Characteristics; Quantitative Evaluation; Reproductive Tract Infections; Research Methodology; Risk Factors; Sampling Studies; Screening--women; Sex Behavior; Sexually Transmitted Diseases; Statistical Regression; Studies; Surveys; United States

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1561588     DOI: 10.1097/00007435-199201000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  11 in total

Review 1.  Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies.

Authors:  E Honey; C Augood; A Templeton; I Russell; J Paavonen; P-A Mårdh; A Stary; B Stray-Pedersen
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 2.  One to one interventions to reduce sexually transmitted infections and under the age of 18 conceptions: a systematic review of the economic evaluations.

Authors:  L Barham; D Lewis; N Latimer
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 3.  The role of epidemiology and surveillance systems in the control of sexually transmitted diseases.

Authors:  M A Catchpole
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1996-10

Review 4.  Drug therapies for sexually transmitted diseases. Clinical and economic considerations.

Authors:  W R Bowie
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Prevalence of chlamydial antibody in pregnancy. A matched-pair study.

Authors:  P Olliaro; A Regazzetti; A L Marchetti; P Lanzarini; A Spinillo; G Gorini
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Low diagnostic accuracy of selective screening criteria for asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections in the general population.

Authors:  I G van Valkengoed; S A Morré; A J van den Brule; C J Meijer; W Devillé; L M Bouter; A J Boeke
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.519

7.  High prevalence of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women presenting in different clinical settings in Jamaica: implications for control strategies.

Authors:  G Dowe; M Smikle; S D King; H Wynter; J Frederick; T Hylton-Kong
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.519

8.  Risk factors for genital chlamydial infection.

Authors:  Christine Navarro; Anne Jolly; Rama Nair; Yue Chen
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  2002-05

9.  Epidemiological study of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnant women in Hungary.

Authors:  T Nyári; J Deák; E Nagy; I Veréb; L Kovács; G Mészáros; H Orvos; I Berbik
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.519

10.  Applying a mixed-integer program to model re-screening women who test positive for C. trachomatis infection.

Authors:  Guoyu Tao; Bartholomew K Abban; Thomas L Gift; Guantao Chen; Kathleen L Irwin
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2004-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.