AIMS: The significance of mild residual descending aortic narrowing in post-coarctectomy patients is not known. The aim of our study was to investigate the influence of mild residual descending aortic narrowing on blood pressure and vascular damage in patients after repair of aortic coarctation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 107 consecutive post-coarctectomy patients, magnetic resonance imaging, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and B-mode ultrasound of the carotid arteries were performed. A significant residual aortic narrowing was defined as: (i) a resting blood pressure gradient > or =30 mmHg with hypertension or exercise-induced hypertension (European Society of Cardiology guidelines); and/or (ii) a site of repair/diaphragmatic aorta ratio <0.7. Thirty-four patients (32%) had a significant residual aortic narrowing and were excluded from the analysis. Of the remaining 73 patients (43 male) with no or only mild residual descending aortic narrowing, median age was 29.8 years (range 17.1-52.5 years), mean age at repair 8.1 years (range 0.02-37.3 years), mean arm/leg gradient 2+/-12 mmHg, and mean common carotid intima-media thickness 0.612+/-0.118 mm. Thirty-three (45%) of these patients had hypertension. In multivariable regression analysis the site of repair/diaphragmatic aorta ratio was a strong and independent predictor of mean daytime systolic blood pressure (P<0.001) and common carotid intima-media thickness (P=0.027). CONCLUSION: Mild residual descending aortic narrowing in post-coarctectomy patients is independently associated with mean daytime blood pressure and carotid intima-media thickness. Our data suggest that a threshold for re-intervention of residual aortic narrowing lower than posed in current guidelines may be desirable to improve long-term outcome in these patients. However, further research on such aggressive interventional approaches is needed.
AIMS: The significance of mild residual descending aortic narrowing in post-coarctectomy patients is not known. The aim of our study was to investigate the influence of mild residual descending aortic narrowing on blood pressure and vascular damage in patients after repair of aortic coarctation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 107 consecutive post-coarctectomy patients, magnetic resonance imaging, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, and B-mode ultrasound of the carotid arteries were performed. A significant residual aortic narrowing was defined as: (i) a resting blood pressure gradient > or =30 mmHg with hypertension or exercise-induced hypertension (European Society of Cardiology guidelines); and/or (ii) a site of repair/diaphragmatic aorta ratio <0.7. Thirty-four patients (32%) had a significant residual aortic narrowing and were excluded from the analysis. Of the remaining 73 patients (43 male) with no or only mild residual descending aortic narrowing, median age was 29.8 years (range 17.1-52.5 years), mean age at repair 8.1 years (range 0.02-37.3 years), mean arm/leg gradient 2+/-12 mmHg, and mean common carotid intima-media thickness 0.612+/-0.118 mm. Thirty-three (45%) of these patients had hypertension. In multivariable regression analysis the site of repair/diaphragmatic aorta ratio was a strong and independent predictor of mean daytime systolic blood pressure (P<0.001) and common carotid intima-media thickness (P=0.027). CONCLUSION: Mild residual descending aortic narrowing in post-coarctectomy patients is independently associated with mean daytime blood pressure and carotid intima-media thickness. Our data suggest that a threshold for re-intervention of residual aortic narrowing lower than posed in current guidelines may be desirable to improve long-term outcome in these patients. However, further research on such aggressive interventional approaches is needed.
Authors: Teun van der Bom; A Carla Zomer; Aeilko H Zwinderman; Folkert J Meijboom; Berto J Bouma; Barbara J M Mulder Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Fabian Rengier; Michael Delles; Joachim Eichhorn; Yoo-Jin Azad; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk; Julia Ley-Zaporozhan; Rüdiger Dillmann; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Roland Unterhinninghofen; Sebastian Ley Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Sarah A Lawson; Elaine M Urbina; Iris Gutmark-Little; Philip R Khoury; Zhiqian Gao; Philippe F Backeljauw Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-06-24 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Zahra Keshavarz-Motamed; Farhad Rikhtegar Nezami; Ramon A Partida; Kenta Nakamura; Pedro Vinícius Staziaki; Eyal Ben-Assa; Brian Ghoshhajra; Ami B Bhatt; Elazer R Edelman Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 11.195