Literature DB >> 15614548

Harvesting in seasonal environments.

Cailin Xu1, Mark S Boyce, Daryl J Daley.   

Abstract

Most harvest theory is based on an assumption of a constant or stochastic environment, yet most populations experience some form of environmental seasonality. Assuming that a population follows logistic growth we investigate harvesting in seasonal environments, focusing on maximum annual yield (M.A.Y.) and population persistence under five commonly used harvest strategies. We show that the optimal strategy depends dramatically on the intrinsic growth rate of population and the magnitude of seasonality. The ordered effectiveness of these alternative harvest strategies is given for different combinations of intrinsic growth rate and seasonality. Also, for piecewise continuous-time harvest strategies (i.e., open/closed harvest, and pulse harvest) harvest timing is of crucial importance to annual yield. Optimal timing for harvests coincides with maximal rate of decline in the seasonally fluctuating carrying capacity. For large intrinsic growth rate and small environmental variability several strategies (i.e., constant exploitation rate, linear exploitation rate, and time-dependent harvest) are so effective that M.A.Y. is very close to maximum sustainable yield (M.S.Y.). M.A.Y. of pulse harvest can be even larger than M.S.Y. because in seasonal environments population size varies substantially during the course of the year and how it varies relative to the carrying capacity is what determines the value relative to optimal harvest rate. However, for populations with small intrinsic growth rate but subject to large seasonality none of these strategies is particularly effective with M.A.Y. much lower than M.S.Y. Finding an optimal harvest strategy for this case and to explore harvesting in populations that follow other growth models (e.g., involving predation or age structure) will be an interesting but challenging problem.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15614548     DOI: 10.1007/s00285-004-0303-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Math Biol        ISSN: 0303-6812            Impact factor:   2.259


  5 in total

1.  Can seasonal changes in density dependence drive population cycles?

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  The effect of seasonal harvesting on stage-structured population models.

Authors:  Sanyi Tang; Lansun Chen
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2003-10-27       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Harvesting natural populations in a randomly fluctuating environment.

Authors:  J R Beddington; R M May
Journal:  Science       Date:  1977-07-29       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Population dynamics of large herbivores: variable recruitment with constant adult survival.

Authors:  J M Gaillard; M Festa-Bianchet; N G Yoccoz
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Optimal harvesting from a population in a stochastic crowded environment.

Authors:  E M Lungu; B Oksendal
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 2.144

  5 in total
  5 in total

1.  Harvesting can increase severity of wildlife disease epidemics.

Authors:  Marc Choisy; Pejman Rohani
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Continuous versus pulse harvesting for population models in constant and variable environment.

Authors:  Elena Braverman; Reneeta Mamdani
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Wildlife Management Practices Associated with Pathogen Exposure in Non-Native Wild Pigs in Florida, U.S.

Authors:  Amanda N Carr; Michael P Milleson; Felipe A Hernández; Hunter R Merrill; Michael L Avery; Samantha M Wisely
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 5.048

4.  Spatio-temporal solutions of a diffusive directed dynamics model with harvesting.

Authors:  Md Kamrujjaman; Kamrun Nahar Keya; Ummugul Bulut; Md Rafiul Islam; Muhammad Mohebujjaman
Journal:  J Appl Math Comput       Date:  2022-06-20

5.  Intermediate coupling between aboveground and belowground biomass maximises the persistence of grasslands.

Authors:  Simon Scheiter; Steven I Higgins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.