Literature DB >> 15614401

Polycyclic musks in the Ruhr catchment area--transport, discharges of waste water, and transformations of HHCB, AHTN and HHCB-lactone.

Kai Bester1.   

Abstract

The polycyclic musk fragrance compounds HHCB (1,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-4,6,6,7,8,8-hexamethylcyclopenta-(g)-2-benzopyran; trade name, e.g. galaxolide) and AHTN (7-acetyl-1,1,3,4,4,6-hexamethyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene, trade name, e.g. tonalide) and the transformation product of HHCB (HHCB-lactone) were analysed in surface water samples and sewage treatment plants (STP) effluents in the Ruhr megalopolis. The STPs were the dominant source for these pollutants. In the part of the river where the drinking water is extracted from the river, about 60 ng L(-1) HHCB, 10 ng L(-1) AHTN and 20-30 ng L(-1) HHCB-lactone were found as typical riverine concentrations, while none of the compounds were detected near the spring of the river. On the other hand sewage treatment plant effluents exhibited concentrations up to 600 ng L(-1). The STP's effluent resulted in elevated concentrations in some parts of the river and in the lakes into which they discharge. As some of the plants emit HHCB-lactone with a significantly changed enantiomeric pattern, biotransformation of HHCB to HHCB-lactone occurs in some waste water treatment plants operating with activated sludge. In those parts of the river where no relevant discharges of waste water or fresh water takes place neither the concentration nor the pattern changes significantly. This holds true especially for the HHCB versus HHCB-lactone ratios which indicates degradation less than 15% of the HHCB inventory in the river Ruhr itself. In other rivers, such as the Rhine, higher levels of HHCB-lactone in comparison to HHCB were detected (ratio 1 : 1).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15614401     DOI: 10.1039/b409213a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Monit        ISSN: 1464-0325


  7 in total

1.  Enantiomeric composition of polycyclic musks in sediments from the Pearl River and Suzhou Creek.

Authors:  Han Song; Xiangying Zeng; Zhiqiang Yu; Delin Zhang; Shuxia Cao; Wenlan Shao; Guoying Sheng; Jiamo Fu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2014-10-17       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Aquatic processes and systems in perspective.

Authors:  Aaron M Peck; Keri C Hornbuckle
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2006-07-20

3.  Distribution and fate of synthetic musks in the Songhua River, Northeastern China: influence of environmental variables.

Authors:  Binyu Lu; Yujie Feng; Peng Gao; Zhaohan Zhang; Nan Lin
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Occurrences and potential risks of 16 fragrances in five German sewage treatment plants and their receiving waters.

Authors:  Ursula Klaschka; Peter Carsten von der Ohe; Anne Bschorer; Sonja Krezmer; Manfred Sengl; Marion Letzel
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 4.223

5.  Determination and environmental risk assessment of synthetic musks in the water and sediments of the Jiaozhou Bay wetland, China.

Authors:  Shujun Jiang; Ling Wang; Minggang Zheng; Yinghua Lou; Lei Shi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Toxicity of synthetic musks to early life stages of the freshwater mussel Lampsilis cardium.

Authors:  M P Gooding; T J Newton; M R Bartsch; K C Hornbuckle
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Enantioselective Determination of Polycyclic Musks in River and Wastewater by GC/MS/MS.

Authors:  Injung Lee; Anantha-Iyengar Gopalan; Kwang-Pill Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.