Dennis Howitt1. 1. Department of Social Sciences, Loughborough University, UK. D.L.Howitt@lboro.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Forensic practitioners conventionally accept that sexual fantasy plays a crucial role in the more serious forms of sexual offending. Fantasy is believed to escalate as part of an increasing cycle of offending severity. AIM: This paper explores the various possible roles of sexual fantasy in sex offending. METHOD: The research literature on the role of sexual fantasy in the sexual behaviours of offender and non-offender groups is surveyed. Using research evidence, the strengths of the different models that emerge are assessed. RESULTS: Fantasy in non-offenders has been shown to be a separate domain of experience that serves to arouse sexually but does not guide behaviour. A number of different models of fantasy in offending are considered: (a) fantasy as a blueprint for offending; (b) fantasy as a rehearsal for offending; (c) fantasy as a means of sexual arousal; (d) fantasy and offending having common origins; and (e) fantasy enhancement/renewal as a cause of offending. CONCLUSIONS: It is argued that the study of sexual fantasy in non-contact sex offenders may have theoretical and practical benefits for research and practice with sex offenders in general.
BACKGROUND: Forensic practitioners conventionally accept that sexual fantasy plays a crucial role in the more serious forms of sexual offending. Fantasy is believed to escalate as part of an increasing cycle of offending severity. AIM: This paper explores the various possible roles of sexual fantasy in sex offending. METHOD: The research literature on the role of sexual fantasy in the sexual behaviours of offender and non-offender groups is surveyed. Using research evidence, the strengths of the different models that emerge are assessed. RESULTS: Fantasy in non-offenders has been shown to be a separate domain of experience that serves to arouse sexually but does not guide behaviour. A number of different models of fantasy in offending are considered: (a) fantasy as a blueprint for offending; (b) fantasy as a rehearsal for offending; (c) fantasy as a means of sexual arousal; (d) fantasy and offending having common origins; and (e) fantasy enhancement/renewal as a cause of offending. CONCLUSIONS: It is argued that the study of sexual fantasy in non-contact sex offenders may have theoretical and practical benefits for research and practice with sex offenders in general.