Literature DB >> 15614033

Comparison of different therapeutic strategies in hypertension: a low-dose combination of perindopril/indapamide versus a sequential monotherapy or a stepped-care approach.

Jean-Jacques Mourad1, Bernard Waeber, Faïez Zannad, Maurice Laville, Gérard Duru, Michel Andréjak.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and the tolerability of three different strategies in the treatment of hypertension (low-dose combination, sequential monotherapy and stepped-care).
DESIGN: Hypertensive patients were randomized to a 9-month treatment with the aim to lower blood pressure below 140/90 mmHg. Treatment adjustments were allowed at months 3 and 6. The study was discontinued for patients with normal blood pressure at month 6. In the 'low-dose combination' group, perindopril (2 mg) and indapamide (0.625 mg) were first administered with the possibility to increase the doses in two steps up to respectively, 4 and 1.25 mg. In the 'sequential monotherapy' group, the treatment was initiated with atenolol (50 mg), replaced if necessary by losartan (50 mg), and then by amlodipine (5 mg). In the 'stepped-care' group, valsartan, was given first at a 40 mg dose, then at a 80 mg dose, to be co-administered finally if needed with hydrochlorothiazide, 12.5 mg. All study tablets were encapsulated to conceal their identity and had to be taken once a day. PATIENTS: Patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension were recruited (n = 180 in the 'low-dose combination' group, n = 176 in the 'sequential monotherapy' group and n = 177 in the 'stepped-care' group).
RESULTS: The percentage of patients having achieved the target blood pressure was significantly greater in the 'low-dose combination' group (62%) than in the 'sequential monotherapy' (49%, P = 0.02) and the 'stepped-care' group (47%, P = 0.005). The percentage of patients having normalized their blood pressure without experiencing drug-related adverse events was also significantly higher in the 'low-dose combination' group (56%) than in the 'sequential monotherapy' (42%, P = 0.002) and the 'stepped-care' group (42%, P = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: A first line management of hypertension based on a low-dose combination of perindopril and indapamide allows the normalization of blood pressure in significantly more patients than a 'sequential monotherapy' strategy involving atenolol, losartan and amlodipine, and a 'stepped-care' strategy involving valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide. These better blood pressure results were not obtained at the expense of a worsening of tolerability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15614033     DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200412000-00021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  25 in total

1.  Association of Low-Dose Triple Combination Therapy With Therapeutic Inertia and Prescribing Patterns in Patients With Hypertension: A Secondary Analysis of the TRIUMPH Trial.

Authors:  Nelson Wang; Abdul Salam; Ruth Webster; Asita de Silva; Rama Guggilla; Sandrine Stepien; Jayanthi Mysore; Laurent Billot; Stephen Jan; Pallab K Maulik; Nitish Naik; Vanessa Selak; Simon Thom; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Anushka Patel; Anthony Rodgers
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 14.676

Review 2.  Antihypertensive Combination Treatment: State of the Art.

Authors:  M Burnier
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  Optimizing blood pressure control in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Biff F Palmer; Andrew Z Fenves
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2010-07

Review 4.  Hydrochlorothiazide versus calcium channel blockers: what is the best add-on to a renin-angiotensin system blocker for treating hypertension in patients with renal disease?

Authors:  Edgar V Lerma
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 5.  Economic benefits of treating high-risk hypertension with angiotensin II receptor antagonists (blockers).

Authors:  Antonio Coca
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.859

6.  Combination therapy in hypertension.

Authors:  Alan H Gradman; Jan N Basile; Barry L Carter; George L Bakris
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 3.738

7.  Efficacy and safety of irbesartan/HCTZ in severe hypertension according to cardiometabolic factors.

Authors:  Stanley S Franklin; Joel M Neutel
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.738

8.  Efficacy and safety of irbesartan/HCTZ combination therapy as initial treatment for rapid control of severe hypertension.

Authors:  Joel M Neutel; Stanley S Franklin; Suzanne Oparil; Amitabha Bhaumik; Agata Ptaszynska; Pablo Lapuerta
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 9.  The efficacy and safety of triple vs dual combination of angiotensin II receptor blocker and calcium channel blocker and diuretic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pinar Kizilirmak; Mehmet Berktas; Yagiz Uresin; Okan Bulent Yildiz
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.738

Review 10.  The risks and benefits of initial irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy in patients with severe hypertension.

Authors:  Pablo Lapuerta; Stanley Franklin
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.