Literature DB >> 15613385

Methodological aspects of the genetic dissection of gene expression.

O Carlborg1, D J De Koning, K F Manly, E Chesler, R W Williams, C S Haley.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Dissection of the genetics underlying gene expression utilizes techniques from microarray analyses as well as quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping. Available QLT mapping methods are not tailored for the highly automated analyses required to deal with the thousand of gene transcripts encountered in the mapping of QTL affecting gene expression (sometimes referred to as eQTL). This report focuses on the adaptation of QTL mapping methodology to perform automated mapping of QTL affecting gene expression.
RESULTS: The analyses of expression data on > 12,000 gene transcripts in BXD recombinant inbred mice found, on average, 629 QTL exceeding the genome-wide 5% threshold. Using additional information on trait repeatabilities and QTL location, 168 of these were classified as 'high confidence' QTL. Current sample sizes of genetical genomics studies make it possible to detect a reasonable number of QTL using simple genetic models, but considerably larger studies are needed to evaluate more complex genetic models. After extensive analyses of real data and additional simulated data (altogether > 300,000 genome scans) we make the following recommendations for detection of QTL for gene expression: (1) For populations with an unbalanced number of replicates on each genotype, weighted least squares should be preferred above ordinary least squares. Weights can be based on repeatability of the trait and the number of replicates. (2) A genome scan based on multiple marker information but analysing only at marker locations is a good approximation to a full interval mapping procedure. (3) Significance testing should be based on empirical genome-wide significance thresholds that are derived for each trait separately. (4) The significant QTL can be separated into high and low confidence QTL using a false discovery rate that incorporates prior information such as transcript repeatabilities and co-localization of gene-transcripts and QTL. (5) Including observations on the founder lines in the QTL analysis should be avoided as it inflates the test statistic and increases the Type I error. (6) To increase the computational efficiency of the study, use of parallel computing is advised. These recommendations are summarized in a possible strategy for mapping of QTL in a least squares framework. AVAILABILITY: The software used for this study is available on request from the authors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15613385     DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  27 in total

1.  QTL analysis of soybean seed weight across multi-genetic backgrounds and environments.

Authors:  Yingpeng Han; Dongmei Li; Dan Zhu; Haiyan Li; Xiuping Li; Weili Teng; Wenbin Li
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  A systems genetic analysis of alcohol drinking by mice, rats and men: influence of brain GABAergic transmission.

Authors:  Laura M Saba; Beth Bennett; Paula L Hoffman; Kelsey Barcomb; Takao Ishii; Katerina Kechris; Boris Tabakoff
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 5.250

3.  Quantitative trait locus mapping of acute functional tolerance in the LXS recombinant inbred strains.

Authors:  Beth Bennett; Colin Larson; Phillip A Richmond; Aaron T Odell; Laura M Saba; Boris Tabakoff; Robin Dowell; Richard A Radcliffe
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  An integrative genomics approach to infer causal associations between gene expression and disease.

Authors:  Eric E Schadt; John Lamb; Xia Yang; Jun Zhu; Steve Edwards; Debraj Guhathakurta; Solveig K Sieberts; Stephanie Monks; Marc Reitman; Chunsheng Zhang; Pek Yee Lum; Amy Leonardson; Rolf Thieringer; Joseph M Metzger; Liming Yang; John Castle; Haoyuan Zhu; Shera F Kash; Thomas A Drake; Alan Sachs; Aldons J Lusis
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-06-19       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Candidate genes and their regulatory elements: alcohol preference and tolerance.

Authors:  Laura Saba; Sanjiv V Bhave; Nicholas Grahame; Paula Bice; Razvan Lapadat; John Belknap; Paula L Hoffman; Boris Tabakoff
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 6.  Genetic dissection of gene regulation in multiple mouse tissues.

Authors:  Chris J Cotsapas; Rohan B H Williams; Jeremy N Pulvers; David J Nott; Eva K F Chan; Mark J Cowley; Peter F R Little
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2006-06-12       Impact factor: 2.957

7.  Fine mapping of regulatory loci for mammalian gene expression using radiation hybrids.

Authors:  Christopher C Park; Sangtae Ahn; Joshua S Bloom; Andy Lin; Richard T Wang; Tongtong Wu; Aswin Sekar; Arshad H Khan; Christine J Farr; Aldons J Lusis; Richard M Leahy; Kenneth Lange; Desmond J Smith
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-03-23       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Genetic variation within the Chrna7 gene modulates nicotine reward-like phenotypes in mice.

Authors:  J L Harenza; P P Muldoon; M De Biasi; M I Damaj; M F Miles
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.449

9.  Genetical genomic determinants of alcohol consumption in rats and humans.

Authors:  Boris Tabakoff; Laura Saba; Morton Printz; Pam Flodman; Colin Hodgkinson; David Goldman; George Koob; Heather N Richardson; Katerina Kechris; Richard L Bell; Norbert Hübner; Matthias Heinig; Michal Pravenec; Jonathan Mangion; Lucie Legault; Maurice Dongier; Katherine M Conigrave; John B Whitfield; John Saunders; Bridget Grant; Paula L Hoffman
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  Genetics of the hippocampal transcriptome in mouse: a systematic survey and online neurogenomics resource.

Authors:  Rupert W Overall; Gerd Kempermann; Jeremy Peirce; Lu Lu; Dan Goldowitz; Fred H Gage; Shirlean Goodwin; August B Smit; David C Airey; Glenn D Rosen; Leonard C Schalkwyk; Thomas R Sutter; Richard S Nowakowski; Stephen Whatley; Robert W Williams
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.